Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 May 11;2025(5):rjae511.
doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae511. eCollection 2025 May.

Abdominal-based free flap reconstruction of the breast in a patient with prior cryolipolysis: a case report and literature review

Affiliations
Case Reports

Abdominal-based free flap reconstruction of the breast in a patient with prior cryolipolysis: a case report and literature review

Steven L Zhang et al. J Surg Case Rep. .

Abstract

Abdominal-based flaps, including deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, are workhorse flaps for autologous breast reconstruction. These flaps are vascularized by perforators originating from the deep inferior epigastric vessels and traversing through the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissue to supply the skin. As such, previous abdominal procedures, such as liposuction, may compromise flap perfusion and affect the choice of reconstruction. While there are numerous studies investigating the impact of liposuction on abdominal-based flaps, there is limited data on the implications of cryolipolysis, which is a relatively newer modality of non-invasive body contouring that is gaining increasing popularity. We describe a case of autologous breast reconstruction in a patient who had undergone cryolipolysis, where a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was used as the perforators were too small for reliable perfusion of a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.

Keywords: breast reconstruction; cryolipolysis; microsurgery; plastic surgery; reconstructive surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative CT angiography showing small maximum perforator diameter of 1 mm (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative markings of perforator locations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Right nipple sparing mastectomy specimen.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Largest perforator with diameter of 1 mm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Right muscle-sparing TRAM flap.

References

    1. Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, et al. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: a population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021;41:1183–94. 10.1002/cac2.12207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyland CJ, Irwin TJ, Rinkinen JR, et al. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction in the setting of cryolipolysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3976. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003976. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farid M, Kotwal A, Akali A. DIEP breast reconstruction following multiple abdominal liposuction procedures. Eplasty 2014;14:e47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Ellsworth WA, et al. Breast reconstruction with DIEP and SIEA flaps in patients with prior abdominal liposuction. Microsurgery 2018;38:413–8. 10.1002/micr.30218. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bond ES, Soteropulos CE, Poore SO. The impact of abdominal liposuction on abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2022;49:324–31. 10.1055/s-0042-1748646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources