Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 12;11(1):124.
doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00944-x.

Cortical microstructural abnormalities in dementia with Lewy bodies and their associations with Alzheimer's disease copathologies

Affiliations

Cortical microstructural abnormalities in dementia with Lewy bodies and their associations with Alzheimer's disease copathologies

Elijah Mak et al. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) frequently coexists with Alzheimer's disease pathology, yet the pattern of cortical microstructural injury and its relationship with amyloid, tau, and cerebrovascular pathologies remains unclear. We applied neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to assess cortical microstructural integrity in 57 individuals within the DLB spectrum and 57 age- and sex-matched cognitively unimpaired controls by quantifying mean diffusivity (MD), tissue-weighted neurite density index (tNDI), orientation dispersion index (ODI), and free water fraction (FWF). Amyloid and tau levels were measured using PiB and Flortaucipir PET imaging. Compared to controls, DLB exhibited increased MD and FWF, reduced tNDI across multiple regions, and focal ODI reductions in the occipital cortex. Structural equation modeling revealed that APOE genotype influenced amyloid levels, which elevated tau, leading to microstructural injury. These findings highlight the role of AD pathology in DLB neurodegeneration, advocating for multi-target therapeutic approaches addressing both AD and DLB-specific pathologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: E. Mak, R.I. Reid, S.A. Przybelski, A.M. Fought, and T.G. Lesnick report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C.G. Schwarz receives research support from the NIH. J. Graff-Radford serves on the editorial board for Neurology and receives research support from NIH. M.L. Senjem owns or has owned stock in medical-related companies, unrelated to the current work, within the past 36 months: Align Technology, Inc., Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mesa Laboratories, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, LHC Group, Inc., Natus Medical Inc., and Varex Imaging Corporation. J.A. Fields reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. D.S. Knopman serves on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for the DIAN study, has served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for a tau therapeutic for Biogen but received no personal compensation, is a site investigator in Biogen aducanumab trials, is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Lilly Pharmaceuticals and the University of Southern California, serves as a consultant for Samus Therapeutics, Roche, Magellan Health and Alzeca Biosciences but receives no personal compensation, and receives research support from the NIH. D.T. Jones reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. R. Savica reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. V.K. Ramanan receives research funding from the NIH and the Mangurian Foundation for Lewy Body disease research and has provided educational content for Medscape unrelated to this work. T. Ferman receives funding from the Mangurian Foundation for Lewy body research and NIH. NR Graff-Radford reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. V.J. Lowe serves as a consultant for Bayer Schering Pharma, Piramal Life Sciences, Life Molecular Imaging, Eisai Inc., AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, and Merck Research and receives research support from GE Healthcare, Siemens Molecular Imaging, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, and the NIH (NIA, NCI). Clifford R. Jack Jr. is employed by Mayo Clinic. He receives grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (R37 AG011378, R01 AG041851), the Alexander family professorship and the GHR Foundation. Within the past 36 months, he served on a DSMB for Roche pro bono; no payments to the individual or institution were involved. He has received funding from the Alzheimer’s Association for travel to scientific meetings. R.C. Petersen serves as a consultant for Roche, Inc., Merck, Inc., Biogen, Inc., Eisai, Inc., Genentech, Inc., and Nestle, Inc., served on a DSMB for Genentech, receives royalties from Oxford University Press and UpToDate, and receives NIH funding. B.F. Boeve has served as an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Alector, Cognition Therapeutics, EIP Pharma, and Transposon. He serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Tau Consortium—funded by the Rainwater Charitable Foundation. He receives research support from NIH, the Mayo Clinic Dorothy and Harry T. Mangurian Jr. Lewy Body Dementia Program, the Little Family Foundation, and the Ted Turner and Family Foundation. E.K. Louis has no disclosures related to this work. He has served as a Co-Investigator on K. Kantarci research grant (DLB U01) and as a NAPS co-investigator. J.T. O’Brien. has no conflicts related to this study; unrelated to this work he has received honoraria for work as DSMB chair or member for TauRx, Axon, Eisai, has acted as a consultant for Roche, and has received research support from Alliance Medical and Merck. K. Kantarci consults for Biogen, receives research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly, and receives funding from NIH and Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation. GS Day reports no competing interests directly relevant to this work. His research is supported by NIH (K23AG064029, U01AG057195, U01NS120901, U19AG032438). He serves as a consultant for Parabon Nanolabs Inc and as a Topic Editor (Dementia) for DynaMed (EBSCO). He is the co-Project PI for a clinical trial in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, which receives support from NINDS (U01NS120901) and Amgen Pharmaceuticals; and a consultant for Arialys Therapeutics. He has developed educational materials for Continuing Education Inc and Ionis Pharmaceutical. He owns stock in ANI pharmaceuticals. Dr. Day’s institution has received support from Eli Lilly for development and participation in an educational event promoting early diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer disease, and in-kind contributions of radiotracer precursors for tau-PET neuroimaging in studies of memory and aging (via Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Topographic distributions of GM microstructural injury in DLB spectrum relative to matched CU individuals.
Pairwise group differences in (a) regional MD, (b) tNDI, (c) ODI, and (d) FWF were examined using conditional logistic regression models to account for the 1:1 matching between groups. T-statistics from the significant comparisons after adjusting for FDR are depicted on both volumetric templates and 3D glass brain renderings. In the DLB spectrum group, significantly elevated MD and FWF was accompanied by decreased tNDI across widespread GM regions, while reductions in ODI were more focal and preferentially localized to posterior-occipital brain regions. CU cognitively unimpaired, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, FDR false discovery rate, GM gray matter, MD mean diffusivity. ODI orientation dispersion index, tNDI tissue-weighted neurite density index, FWF free water fraction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Structural equation modeling of pathological cascades associated with microstructural injury in DLB.
The diagram shows significant direct effects (p < 0.05) between age, APOE ε4 genotype, AD biomarkers (amyloid-β and tau), and composite measures of gray matter microstructure (MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF) in the DLB spectrum. Pathways are color-coded by their origin: age (green), APOE (purple), amyloid-β (orange), and tau (red). Line thickness is proportional to the magnitude of the standardized coefficient, with values and significance levels shown (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). Variables were transformed for analysis: amyloid-β and tau were log-transformed, age was measured in decades, and mean diffusivity was scaled by 100. The model reveals both direct pathways (e.g., tau → MD) and indirect pathways (e.g., APOE → amyloid-β → tau) contributing to microstructural changes. To interpret the SEM findings within the context of anatomical patterns, the topography of each composite GM microstructure is provided next to the DTI and NODDI nodes (FDR q < 0.05 from pairwise group comparisons between DLB spectrum and CU controls). AD Alzheimer’s disease, APOE apolipoprotein E, CU cognitively unimpaired, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, FWF free water fraction, FDR false discovery rate, GM gray matter, MD mean diffusivity, ODI orientation dispersion index, tNDI tissue-weighted neurite density index, SEM structural equation modeling.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Regional associations between tau and GM microstructure integrity in DLB spectrum.
A T-statistics map showing significant associations between tau and MD after FDR correction. Yellow-red colors indicate positive associations. B T-statistics map showing significant associations between tau and tNDI after FDR correction. Blue colors indicate negative associations. C Scatter plot showing the positive relationship between log tau SUVR and predicted MD values in the middle temporal gyrus, with a 95% confidence interval shown in brown shading. D Scatter plot showing the negative relationship between log tau SUVR and predicted tNDI values in the middle temporal gyrus, with a 95% confidence interval shown in blue shading. All regression models were adjusted for age, APOE genotype, amyloid-β, gray matter volume (expressed as a % of TIV), and WMH (expressed as a % of TIV). APOE apolipoprotein E, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, FDR false discovery rate, GM gray matter, MD mean diffusivity, SUVR standardized uptake value ratio, tNDI tissue-weighted neurite density index, TIV total intracranial volume, WMH white matter hyperintensities.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Associations between gray matter microstructure metrices and clinical measures in dementia with Lewy bodies.
Scatterplots rerpesent age-adjusted correlations between composite gray matter microstructural metrics and clinical measures in the DLB spectrum group. A Associations with motor severity (B) Associations with global cognitive impairment. CDR-SB Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, DLB Dementia with Lewy Bodies, GM Gray Matter, MD Mean Diffusivity, tNDI tissue-weighted Neurite Density Index, ODI Orientation Dispersion Index, FWF Free Water Fraction, ROI Region of Interest, UPDRS-III Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Graphical overview of the study design and key analyses.
The study design involved fitting diffusion-weighted imaging datasets with DTI and NODDI models to obtain whole-brain maps of MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF. Participants underwent PET imaging of PiB and Flortaucipir to quantify amyloid-β and tau deposition, respectively. Regional gray matter volumes were derived from structural MRI using SPM12. WMHs were calculated from FLAIR using an automated segmentation technique. The voxelwise MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF parameter maps were parcellated using the MCALT atlas to derive bilateral median values reflecting regional GM microstructural integrity. We employed conditional logistic models to compare regional MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF between the DLB spectrum and CU groups. Subsequently, statistically significant ROIs from the group-wise comparisons were used as composite outcome measures in SEMs to determine their multivariate associations with age, WMH, APOE genotype, amyloid-β, and tau. In exploratory analyses, partial Pearson’s correlations were used to determine the degree to which composites of MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF are related to disease severity and core features in the DLB spectrum. Supplemental regression analyses were used to explore the topographical associations of tau and amyloid PET meta-ROIs with regionally specific MD, tNDI, ODI, and FWF, irrespective of group differences. These models were adjusted for age, APOE genotype, gray matter volumes (expressed as the % of TIV), and WMH (expressed as the % of TIV). AD Alzheimer’s disease, APOE apolipoprotein E, CDR-SB clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes, CU cognitively unimpaired, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, DTI diffusion tensor imaging, FDR false discovery rate, FLAIR fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, FWF free water fraction, GM gray matter, TIV total intracranial volume, MCALT Mayo clinic adult lifespan template, MD mean diffusivity, NODDI neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, ODI orientation dispersion index, PET positron emission tomography, Amyloid-β Pittsburgh compound B, RBD REM sleep behavior disorder, ROIs regions of interest, SEM structural equation modeling, tNDI tissue-weighted neurite density index, UPDRS unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale, WMH white matter hyperintensity.

References

    1. Vann Jones, S. A. & O’Brien, J. T. The prevalence and incidence of dementia with Lewy bodies: a systematic review of population and clinical studies. Psychol. Med.44, 673–683 (2013). - PubMed
    1. McKeith, I. G. et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology89, 88–100 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKeith, I. G. et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB consortium. Neurology65, 1863–1872 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Ferman, T. J. et al. The limbic and neocortical contribution of α-Synuclein, tau, and amyloid β to disease duration in dementia with Lewy bodies. Alzheimers Dement.14, 330–339 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker, L. et al. Neuropathologically mixed Alzheimer’s and Lewy body disease: burden of pathological protein aggregates differs between clinical phenotypes. Acta Neuropathol.129, 729–748 (2015). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources