Anti-regurgitation infant formulas and antacid medication: match or mismatch?
- PMID: 40355562
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-06161-1
Anti-regurgitation infant formulas and antacid medication: match or mismatch?
Abstract
A perceived need for treatment has led to the development and widespread marketing of various anti-regurgitation (AR) infant formulas, promoted as effective solutions for managing regurgitation symptoms. For practice, limited comparative data exists on the specific thickening agents, or the relative thicknesses of AR formulas. An added concern is that some infants on AR formulas simultaneously receive pharmacological treatments for reflux, such as antacids or gastric acid inhibitors, and no information about compatibility is available. One reference formula (Nutrilon® Profutura 1, Nutricia) and four formulas labelled as 'anti-regurgitation' with different nutritional compositions were used to evaluate the effect of pH and time on viscosity. The viscosity of marketed AR formulas was tested with a rotational rheometer. All four AR formulas demonstrated higher viscosity compared to the reference formula, with notable differences based on the thickening strategy used by the manufacturer. Pre-thickened CBG-based AR formulas generally showed higher viscosity than pre-thickened starch-based formulas. Adding a casein-dominant protein fraction increased viscosity in acidic environments; however, this effect gradually diminished over time, likely due to protein hydrolysis. Moderate (pH 4) compared to strong acidic conditions (pH 1) had only minimal impact on viscosity, indicating compatibility with gastric acid inhibitors across all AR formulas.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CBG-based AR formulas should be allowed to stand for at least 30 min after preparation to achieve the intended viscosity. Additionally, AR formulas thickened with CBG generally exhibit higher viscosity than pre-thickened starch-based formulas. Notably, casein-based thickening occurs even when gastric acid suppressants are used, and combining casein with acid suppression may even slow down the rate of viscosity reduction over time.
What is known: • Commercially available infant formula sometimes uses thickening agents to reduce regurgitation, but their effectiveness may vary depending on composition and gastric conditions. • Some thickening agents require an acidic environment to activate, which may be compromised by concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants.
What is new: • This study demonstrates that CBG-based AR formulas generally maintain higher viscosity than starch-based formulas, even with acid suppression. • Viscosity in some formulas changes over time, indicating that preparation timing affects therapeutic consistency.
Keywords: Antacids; Gastroesophageal reflux; Infant formula; Paediatrics; Proton pump inhibitor; Viscosity.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Thickened infant formula: What to know.Nutrition. 2018 May;49:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.10.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Nutrition. 2018. PMID: 29495000 Review.
-
[Thickened infant formula, rheological study of the "in vitro" properties].An Pediatr (Barc). 2010 May;72(5):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Apr 14. An Pediatr (Barc). 2010. PMID: 20395184 Spanish.
-
The viscosity-enhancing effect of carob bean gum and sodium carboxymethylcellulose when added to infant formula.Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Jan 11;12(4):2661-2670. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3947. eCollection 2024 Apr. Food Sci Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38628187 Free PMC article.
-
[Comparison between pre-thickened and home-thickened formulas in gastroesophageal reflux treatement].J Pediatr (Rio J). 2003 Jan-Feb;79(1):49-54. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2003. PMID: 12973509 Clinical Trial. Portuguese.
-
Milk protein-based infant formula containing rice starch and low lactose reduces common regurgitation in healthy term infants: a randomized, blinded, and prospective trial.J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(2):136-46. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2013.828578. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014. PMID: 24724771 Review.
References
-
- Haiden N, Savino F, Hill S et al (2024) Infant formulas for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders: a position paper of the ESPGHAN Nutrition Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 79:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPN3.12240 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M et al (2018) Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 66:516. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001889 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cheung KY, Petrou L, Helfer B et al (2023) Health and nutrition claims for infant formula: international cross sectional survey. BMJ 380. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ-2022-071075
-
- Gorsen S, Boussery K, Van Winckel M et al (2020) Perspectives of parents and health care providers about (non)medical treatment in infants with reflux. Pharmacy (Basel) 8:226. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACY8040226 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Salvatore S, Savino F, Singendonk M et al (2018) Thickened infant formula: what to know. Nutrition 49:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUT.2017.10.010 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous