Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May 13;48(1):413.
doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03539-5.

Bicentric clinical study: Feasibility of 088 long sheath in trans-radial carotid artery stenting

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Bicentric clinical study: Feasibility of 088 long sheath in trans-radial carotid artery stenting

Wei Cao et al. Neurosurg Rev. .

Abstract

This study evaluates the feasibility and safety profile of carotid artery stenting (CAS) via transradial access (TRA) using a 0.088-inch-diameter ('088') long sheath, providing an alternative to the conventional transfemoral approach in patients with carotid artery stenosis. A retrospective review of 16 consecutive patients who underwent CAS via TRA at two neurointerventional centres from 2021 to 2022 was conducted. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as residual stenosis of less than 30% without major perioperative complications. Secondary outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction, and radial artery occlusion within 30 days post-procedure. All procedures achieved technical success. One patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA) intraoperatively that resolved without sequelae. No major disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, or radial artery occlusion occurred during 30-day follow-up. The mean post-operative residual stenosis was 10.8% ± 6.4%. Most patients (87.5%) were treated with a distal protection device, and none required conversion to transfemoral access. Although limited by sample size and lack of long-term follow-up, this study suggests that CAS via TRA using an 088 long sheath is a feasible and safe alternative in selected patients, particularly those with challenging vascular anatomy.

Keywords: Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery stenting; Long sheath; Nerve intervention; Transradial access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: This was a retrospective case series and literature review. No human subjects, human material, or human data were involved so that the ethics committee approval was not required. Disclosures: All authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest related to this research or its publication. Guarantor: Yibin FANG, M.D. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected Carotid-Artery stenting versus endarterectomy in High-Risk patients. N Engl J Med 351(15):1493–1501 - DOI - PubMed
    1. GRIBAR JJ, JIDDOU M, CHOKSI N et al (2011) Carotid stenting in High-Risk patients: early and late outcomes. J Interv Cardiol 24(3):247–253 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of Carotid-Artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363(1):11–23 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Hye RJ, Mackey A, Hill MD et al (2015) Incidence, outcomes, and effect on quality of life of cranial nerve injury in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial. J Vasc Surg 61(5):1208–1215 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernat I, Horak D, Stasek J et al (2014) ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(10):964–972 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources