Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May 12;29(1):188.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05401-y.

Effect of early adjunctive vasopressin initiation for septic shock patients: a target trial emulation

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effect of early adjunctive vasopressin initiation for septic shock patients: a target trial emulation

Kyle C White et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: In septic shock, the optimal timing of adjunctive vasopressin initiation shock is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of its early initiation for patients with septic shock.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter target trial emulation to estimate the intensive care unit (ICU) mortality effect of early (≤ 6 h) adjunctive vasopressin compared with usual care. Eligible patients had septic shock diagnosed within 6 h of ICU admission. The primary outcome of this study was 30-day ICU mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to test the interaction of early vasopressin start with peak norepinephrine-equivalent dose (NED) at 6 h, APACHE score, peak lactate at 6 h and invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were the impact of delayed vasopressin introduction on 30-day ICU mortality and effect of NED at vasopressin start on 30-day ICU mortality. We used the parametric g-formula to emulate a target trial.

Results: Overall, 3,105 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62 years and mean APACHE III score was 83. In the first six hours of vasopressor therapy, 1,864 (60%) patients were invasively ventilated. Estimated 30-day ICU mortality was 19.34% (95%CI, 17.0 to 21.68) in the no vasopressin group and 18.45% (95%CI, 16.26 to 20.63) in the early vasopressin group; relative risk 0.95 (95%CI, 0.93 to 0.98). The estimated 30-day ICU mortality effect of starting vasopressin was particularly strong at lower norepinephrine doses (< 0.25 µg.kg-1.min-1) and significant at lower norepinephrine doses than recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Vasopressin administration progressively increased over the study period, from 35.2% (95%CI, 30.0 to 40.5) in 2015 to 45.1% (95%CI, 40.7 to 49.6) in 2021 (ß = + 1.3% per year; 95%CI, + 0.46 to + 2.16, p = 0.011). Patients had progressively lower norepinephrine equivalent dose (ß = - 0.05 µg.kg-1.min-1 per year; 95%CI, - 0.09 to - 0.002, p = 0.038) and lower total SOFA score (ß = - 0.1 point per year; 95%CI, - 0.18 to - 0.07, p < 0.001) at vasopressin start.

Conclusions: In this emulation of a hypothetical target trial, patients with septic shock benefited from early vasopressin administration. These findings can help design prospective randomised-control trials of early adjunctive vasopressin use in septic shock.

Keywords: Critical care; Hypotension; Sepsis; Shock; Vasodilation; Vasopressin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Metro South Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/QMS/82024) with an individual waiver of consent granted. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Estimated 30-day potential drug-induced mortality risk under a treatment strategy that allows to start vasopressin in the first 6 h versus an intervention that never allows for vasopressin start
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of risk difference of 30-day ICU mortality for each of the interventions tested against an intervention that never allows for vasopressin start
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of risk difference of 30-day ICU mortality for each of the interventions that allows to start vasopressin in the first 6 h versus an intervention that never allows for vasopressin start according to subgroups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of risk difference of 30-day ICU mortality according to norepinephrine equivalent dose threshold for vasopressin introduction versus an intervention that never allows for vasopressin start
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Evolution over the study period of a vasopressin administration; b noradrenaline equivalent dose at vasopressin start time; c Total SOFA score at vasopressin start time; d time from vasopressor start to first vasopressin administration

References

    1. Wieruszewski PM, Khanna AK. Vasopressor choice and timing in vasodilatory shock. Crit Care. 2022;26:76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leone M, Einav S, Antonucci E, Depret F, Lakbar I, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Multimodal strategy to counteract vasodilation in septic shock. Anaesthesia Critic Care Pain Med. 2023;42: 101193. - PubMed
    1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1181–247. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N, Perkins GD, Cecconi M, Cepkova M, et al. Effect of early vasopressin versus norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:509–18. - PubMed
    1. Sacha GL, Lam SW, Wang L, Duggal A, Reddy AJ, Bauer SR. Association of catecholamine dose, lactate, and shock duration at vasopressin initiation with mortality in patients with septic shock*. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:614–23. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources