The false promise of deep-sea mining
- PMID: 40357317
- PMCID: PMC12065671
- DOI: 10.1038/s44183-025-00127-4
The false promise of deep-sea mining
Abstract
Deep-sea mining of the international seabed could begin soon, despite concerns about its ecological consequences. We join others calling for a ban on international seabed mining, but for a different reason: it is a multi-billion-dollar solution to problems that do not exist. We refute three pro-extraction arguments-about (1) mineral scarcity, (2) social benefits, and (3) economic benefits-that misrepresent the state of the mining industry and mineral supply chains.
Keywords: Economics; Environmental studies.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Lipton, E. Trump-era pivot on seabed mining draws global rebuke. New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/30/us/politics/trump-mining-metals-compa... (2025).
-
- Ali, S. H. The US should get serious about mining critical minerals for clean energy: Green technologies cannot advance without a secure supply of essential metals. Nature 615, 10.1038/d41586-023-00790-y (2023). - PubMed
-
- Tunnicliffe, V. et al. Metal mining on land versus the ocean in the context of the current biodiversity crisis. npj Ocean Sustainability 4, 10.1038/s44183-025-00110-z (2025); Nature Editorial Team. Deep-sea mining plans should not be rushed. Nature 627 (704), 10.1038/d41586-024-00890-3 (2024).
-
- United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Article136 (1982).
-
- Auld, G., Betsill, M. & VanDeveer, S. D. Transnational governance for mining and the mineral lifecycle. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.43, 425–453 (2018).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources