Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 28:16:1568108.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1568108. eCollection 2025.

Assessing communicative-pragmatic ability in telehealth: e-ABaCo in autistic individuals

Affiliations

Assessing communicative-pragmatic ability in telehealth: e-ABaCo in autistic individuals

Ilaria Traetta et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulties in social communication. Autistic individuals who are verbally fluent, often show difficulties in pragmatic ability, i.e. the capacity to use language and other expressive means, as gestures or the tone of the voice, to convey meaning in a given context. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of various technologies such as videoconferencing and internet for the delivery of healthcare services, i.e. telehealth, has proven to be effective, accessible and safe tools for remote healthcare. However, there are few tools to assess pragmatic skills in telehealth. This study investigates the effectiveness of the telehealth-adapted Assessment Battery for Communication (e-ABaCo), a clinical tool previously validated for in-person assessments, to evaluate pragmatic abilities in autistic individuals. We expect a substantial equivalence in performance for the administration of the adapted version of e-ABaCo compared to the face-to-face one.

Methods: We compared the performance of 30 autistic adolescents, of which 15 assessed via telehealth (ASD TH) and 15 assessed face-to-face (ASD FtF), with that of 15 adolescents with typical development (face-to-face assessment). The groups were matched for age, sex, and intellectual quotient. E-ABaCo was used to assess both comprehension and production of communicative ability realized through different expressive means, i.e. linguistic, extralinguistic and paralinguistic, as well as social appropriateness.

Results: In line with the expectation, the pragmatic performance of autistic adolescents showed a substantial equivalence when comparing the assessments conducted via telehealth and face-to-face modality. Moreover, in line with the relevant literature, there was a significant difference between the ASD groups' performance (both FtF and TH) and the control group of the adolescents with typical development (CG FtF) in all pragmatic aspects assessed, i.e. the Pragmatic total score, comprehension and production abilities, and all the expressive means investigated.

Discussion: These results confirm the potential usefulness of telehealth assessment procedures, and demonstrate the sensitivity and validity of e-ABaCo for conducting an effective assessment of pragmatic skills in on-line modality in autistic adolescents.

Keywords: adolescents; autism spectrum disorders; autistic people; pragmatics; remote assessment; tele-assessment; tele-evaluation; telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ABaCo mean total scores for each group examined: ASD FtF (ASD face-to-face), ASD TH (ASD telehealth) and CG FtF (Control Group face-to-face). Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. Statistical significance (p < .05) is marked with an asterisk (*).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ABaCo comprehension & production scores for each group examined ASD FtF (ASD face-to-face), ASD TH (ASD telehealth) and CG FtF (Control Group face-to-face). Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. Statistical significance (p < .05) is marked with an asterisk (*).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ABaCo scales scores for each group examined ASD FtF (ASD face-to-face), ASD TH (ASD telehealth) and CG FtF (Control Group face-to-face). Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. Statistical significance (p < .05) is marked with an asterisk (*).

References

    1. Bara BG. Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication. In: Intercultural Pragmatics, vol. 8. MIT Press, Cambridge: (2010). doi: 10.1515/IPRG.2011.020 - DOI
    1. Holler J, Levinson SC. Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends Cogn Sci. (2019) 23:639–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levinson S. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; (1983).
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; (2022). doi: 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787 - DOI
    1. Baird G, Norbury CF. Social (pragmatic) communication disorders and autism spectrum disorder. Arch Dis Childhood. (2016) 101:745–51. doi: 10.1136/ARCHDISCHILD-2014-306944 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources