Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;157(5):3680-3693.
doi: 10.1121/10.0036741.

Forward masking in the inferior colliculus: Dynamics of discharge-rate recovery after narrowband noise maskers

Affiliations

Forward masking in the inferior colliculus: Dynamics of discharge-rate recovery after narrowband noise maskers

Swapna Agarwalla et al. J Acoust Soc Am. .

Abstract

In forward masking, the detection threshold for a target sound (probe) is elevated due to the presence of a preceding sound (masker). Although many factors are known to influence the probe response following a masker, the current work focused on the temporal separation (delay) between the masker and probe and the inter-trial interval (ITI). Human probe thresholds recover from forward masking within 150-300 ms, similar to neural threshold recovery in the inferior colliculus (IC) within 300 ms after tone maskers. Our study focused on the recovery of discharge rate of IC neurons in response to probe tones after narrowband Gaussian noise (GN) forward maskers, with varying time delays. Additionally, we examined how prior masker trials influenced IC rates by varying ITI. Previous masker trials affected probe-evoked discharge rates, with full recovery requiring ITIs over 1.5 s after 70 dB SPL narrowband GN maskers. Neural thresholds in the IC for probes preceded by noise maskers were in the range observed in psychoacoustical studies. Two proposed mechanisms for forward masking, persistence, and efferent gain control, were tested using rate analyses or computational modeling. A physiological model with efferent feedback gain control had responses consistent with trends in the physiological recordings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alves-Pinto, A., Baudoux, S., Palmer, A. R., and Sumner, C. J. (2010). “Forward masking estimated by signal detection theory analysis of neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 477–494.10.1007/s10162-010-0215-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan, M. A., Svec, A., Farhadi, A., Maxwell, B. N., and Carney, L. H. (2023). “Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward masking: Effects of age and hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153(4), 1994.10.1121/10.0017724 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brosch, M., and Schreiner, C. E. (1997). “Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex,” J. Neurophysiol. 77(2), 923–943.10.1152/jn.1997.77.2.923 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carney, L. H., and McDonough, J. M. (2019). “Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels,” Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 81, 1034–1046.10.3758/s13414-018-01644-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carney, L. H., Zilany, M. S., Huang, N. J., Abrams, K. S., and Idrobo, F. (2014). “Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system,” J. Neurosci. 34(4), 1306–1313.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3031-13.2014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources