Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group
- PMID: 40358792
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05656-8
Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group
Abstract
Purpose: To present outcomes of a registry to understand the practice patterns, resource utilization, and nuances of suction mini-percutaneous nephron lithotripsy (SM-PCNL).
Methods: Data from 30 centers in 21 countries were prospectively collected (March-November 2024). SM-PCNL was defined as PCNL using a suction nephrostomy sheath of size 14-22 Fr. with any lithotripsy device. There were no instructions on how to perform the surgical procedure. Stone features and stone-free status were assessed using an unenhanced CT scan. Data are presented as median/interquartile range and frequency/proportion.
Results: 1707 patients were included and 42.4% of them were males. Most were first-time stone formers. Median age was 50 years. Median stone volume was 1700 mm3. Surgery was commonly performed using a single access tract (92.9%) and in supine position (56.5%). The fluoroscopy-only puncture was used as the most common access (70.7%), followed by the combination of fluoroscopy and ultrasound (25.1%). Median operation time was 45 min. The most common sheath was Clearpetra (27.8%). Thulium fiber laser was the most frequent energy used (26.2%). A tubeless procedure with a stent was employed in 47.0% of cases. Most common complications were fever managed by observation (7.3%), fever requiring antibiotics (3.3%), blood transfusion (1.1%), and sepsis (0.2%). Median hospitalization was 3 days. 30-day CT scan showed zero fragments in 82.4% of patients. Reintervention was performed in 2.6% of cases.
Conclusions: This registry outlines the various equipment, peri-operative strategies, complications, and outcomes of SM-PCNL performed in real-world practice, providing valuable data on the nuances of performing such surgery.
Keywords: Kidney calculi; Lithotripsy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Sheath; Suction.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Human rights: Institutional board review approval was obtained by the leading center (Asian Institute of Nephro-Urology, AINU #01/2024) and the remaining centers had approvals from their Institutional board.
References
-
- De Stefano V, Castellani D, Somani BK et al (2024) Suction in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: evolution, development, and outcomes from experimental and clinical studies—results from a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus 10:154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li P, Huang Z, Sun X et al (2022) Comparison of vacuum suction sheath and non-vacuum suction sheath in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Invest Surg 35:1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W (2018) Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. Asian J Urol 5:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.05.001 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert K-D et al (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21:1113–1116. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0230 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
