Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun:204:108572.
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108572. Epub 2025 May 5.

Feasibility, acceptability and clinical outcomes of a real-world, regional lung cancer prehabilitation programme for patients undergoing curative intent radiotherapy

Affiliations

Feasibility, acceptability and clinical outcomes of a real-world, regional lung cancer prehabilitation programme for patients undergoing curative intent radiotherapy

Ewan Gourlay et al. Lung Cancer. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Prehabilitation improves both physiological measurements and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer. The feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of prehabilitation for patients having curative-intent radiotherapy for lung cancer is uncertain.

Methods: Prehab4Cancer (P4C) is a regional, community-based prehabilitation service for patients with cancer in Greater Manchester in the United Kingdom. We present an evaluation of the P4C service for patients undergoing curative-intent radiotherapy for lung cancer over a 2-year period. Feasibility was evaluated against prespecified key performance indicators. Objective physiological and subjective functional assessments were recorded before and after completion. Effects on mortality in comparison to a non-prehab cohort were assessed in an exploratory regression analysis.

Results: A total of 381 patients were referred to P4C via a web-based portal. 86 % (329/381) were contacted by phone and 73 % (279/381) completed an initial assessment. 45 % (172/381) completed the prehab programme with a median of 7 (IQR 3-11) sessions during a median time to commencing treatment of 23 days (IQR 16-34). Median time from referral to assessment was 4 days (IQR 3-6) and 86 % (239/279) were completed within 7 days of referral. Six-Minute Walk Tests improved by an average of 30 m (95 % CI 20.6-41 m, p = <0.001). 16 % (n = 21/132) of participants initially score "Medium" or "High" on IPAQ for weekly physical activity, improving to 52 % (n = 66/132) on programme completion. Participants had a median reduction in score of -2.5 (95 % CI -3.0 to -1.5) in WHODAS 2.0. There was an 8 % reduction in 1-year mortality in patients completing prehab (11 %, 17/160) vs those that did not complete prehab (19 %, 30/158, OR 0.5, 95 % CI 0.24-1.00, p = 0.054) after adjustment for age, gender, performance status and cancer staging.

Conclusions: The P4C programme has demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness in patients with lung cancer undergoing curative-intent radiotherapy.

Keywords: Exercise therapy; Lung cancer; Prehab; Prehabilitation; Quality of healthcare; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources