Verifying authors' claims to have conducted a Systematic Review? A checklist for journal editors and peer reviewers
- PMID: 40361195
- PMCID: PMC12076875
- DOI: 10.1186/s13750-025-00361-w
Verifying authors' claims to have conducted a Systematic Review? A checklist for journal editors and peer reviewers
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Konno K, Cheng SH, Eales J, Frampton G, Kohl C, Livoreil B, Macura B, O’Leary BC, Randall NP, Taylor JJ, Woodcock P, Pullin AS. The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: an open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers. Environ Sci Policy. 2020;114:256–62. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.021. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pullin AS, Cheng SH, Jackson JD, Jacqualyn Eales I, Envall SJ, Fada, Geoff K, Frampton M, Harper AN, Kadykalo C, Kohl K, Konno B, Livoreil D-Y, Ouédraogo, Bethan C, O’Leary G, Pullin N, Randall R, Rees A, Smith R, Sordello EJ, Sterling, Will M. Twardek & Paul woodcock. 2022. Standards of conduct and reporting in evidence syntheses that could inform environmental policy and management decisions. Environ Evid 11, 16. 10.1186/s13750-022-00269-9 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Neal R, Haddaway M, Land B, Macura. A little learning is a dangerous thing: A call for better Understanding of the term ‘systematic review’. Environ Int. 2017;99:356–60. 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.020. - PubMed
-
- Haddaway NR, Macura B, Whaley P, et al. ROSES reporting standards for systematic evidence syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environ Evid. 2018;7:7. 10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources