Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):1548.
doi: 10.3390/foods14091548.

Food Fraud in Plant-Based Proteins: Analytical Strategies and Regulatory Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Food Fraud in Plant-Based Proteins: Analytical Strategies and Regulatory Perspectives

Jun-Hyeok Ham et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Food fraud and adulteration have been persistent issues affecting food supply chains throughout history. They intensify in parallel with the continuous growth in the global food market. Plant-based proteins, which are recognized as sustainable alternatives, face increased food fraud risks because of disparities in the cost of raw materials and complex processing methods. Despite these challenges, most efforts toward preventing food fraud and developing detection technologies have largely focused on animal-based products, with limited attention given to plant-based proteins. This comprehensive review systematically examines the characteristics of major plant protein sources and explores documented instances of food fraud (e.g., ingredient substitution, adulteration with lower-cost alternatives, and mislabeling) within this sector. Furthermore, we discuss key analytical techniques in detecting food fraud, including chromatography, DNA analysis, spectroscopy, and imaging-based approaches, examining their applications and effectiveness. A systematic literature review was conducted using structured search strategies across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, covering publications from 2010 to 2025 and incorporating keywords related to plant-based proteins, food fraud, adulteration, and authentication, thereby ensuring methodological rigor and comprehensive coverage. This study provides a foundational framework to strengthen food fraud prevention strategies and uphold the integrity of the expanding plant-based protein market.

Keywords: adulteration detection; food authenticity; food fraud; plant-based proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytical approaches for detecting food fraud in plant-based proteins.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The systematic literature review’s workflow for identifying and selecting relevant studies.

References

    1. Lee S.Y., Lee D.Y., Jeong J.W., Kim J.H., Yun S.H., Joo S.-T., Choi I., Choi J.S., Kim G.-D., Hur S.J. Studies on meat alternatives with a focus on structuring technologies. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2023;16:1389–1412. doi: 10.1007/s11947-022-02992-0. - DOI
    1. Wood P., Tavan M. A review of the alternative protein industry. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022;47:100869. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100869. - DOI
    1. Khanashyam A.C., Mundanat A.S., Sajith Babu K., Thorakkattu P., Krishnan R., Abdullah S., Bekhit A.E.A., McClements D.J., Santivarangkna C., Nirmal N.P. Emerging alternative food protein sources: Production process, quality parameters, and safety point of view. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2025;45:1–22. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2024.2341902. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dekkers B.L., Boom R.M., van der Goot A.J. Structuring processes for meat analogues. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;81:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.011. - DOI
    1. Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A. Food in the anthropocene: The EAT–lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources