Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 26;15(9):1102.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091102.

Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Detects Ischemic Dysfunction at Rest, Reflecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations

Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Detects Ischemic Dysfunction at Rest, Reflecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease

George Koulaouzidis et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The role of speckle-tracking echocardiography in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of global longitudinal strain (GLS) in predicting significant CAD. Methods: In this prospective study, 103 symptomatic patients referred for invasive coronary angiography were enrolled. All patients underwent resting echocardiography with GLS assessment prior to angiography. Exclusion criteria included acute coronary syndrome, known history of CAD, and the presence of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. Significant CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis in at least one major epicardial coronary artery. Results: The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 9.3 years, with 78.6% being male. Hypertension was present in 63.1% of patients, dyslipidemia in 77.7%, diabetes mellitus in 22.3%, smoking history in 71.9%, and a family history of premature CAD in 24.3%. Significant CAD was identified in 45.6% (n = 47), while the remaining 54.3% (n = 56) had non-significant or no coronary artery disease. Patients with significant CAD exhibited significantly lower GLS values compared to those without (-15.73 ± 2.64% vs. -17.6 ± 1.85%, p = 0.001). A GLS threshold of >-16.3 predicted significant CAD with 66% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity (AUC = 0.692, p = 0.001). GLS demonstrated diagnostic accuracy in identifying disease in individual coronary territories, with AUCs of 0.754 for the left anterior descending artery (LAD), 0.714 for the left circumflex artery (LCx), and 0.723 for the right coronary artery (RCA). Diagnostic performance improved when GLS was combined across all three territories (AUC = 0.796). Conclusions: Resting myocardial GLS is accurate in detecting ischemic myocardial dysfunction and can accurately predict significant stenosis of the respective coronary branch subtending the segments.

Keywords: coronary angiogram; global longitudinal strain; myocardial strain; speckle-tracking echocardiography; stable coronary artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 64-year-old male presented with exertional chest pain and was referred for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease. Resting echocardiography showed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but a markedly reduced GLS of 14.9% (image on the left). Coronary angiography revealed a 70% stenosis in the right coronary artery (image on the right top) and complete (100%) occlusion of the left circumflex artery (image on the right bottom).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve of GLS value to predict the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

References

    1. Virani S.S., Alonso A., Aparicio H.J., Benjamin E.J., Bittencourt M.S., Callaway C.W., Carson A.P., Chamberlain A.M., Cheng S., Delling F.N., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. - PubMed
    1. Schultz W.M., Kelli H.M., Lisko J.C., Varghese T., Shen J., Sandesara P., Quyyumi A.A., Taylor H.A., Gulati M., Harold J.G., et al. Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions. Circulation. 2018;137:2166–2178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029652. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flora G.D., Nayak M.K. A Brief Review of Cardiovascular Diseases, Associated Risk Factors and Current Treatment Regimes. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019;25:4063–4084. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190925163827. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Netala V.R., Teertam S.K., Li H., Zhang Z. A Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Management: Cardiac Biomarkers, Imaging Modalities, Pharmacotherapy, Surgical Interventions, and Herbal Remedies. Cells. 2024;13:1471. doi: 10.3390/cells13171471. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vrints C., Andreotti F., Koskinas K.C., Rossello X., Adamo M., Ainslie J., Banning A.P., Budaj A., Buechel R.R., Chiariello G.A., et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2024;45:3415–3537. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources