Perception Toward Wolves Are Driven by Economic Status and Religion Across Their Distribution Range
- PMID: 40362010
- PMCID: PMC12071121
- DOI: 10.3390/ani15091196
Perception Toward Wolves Are Driven by Economic Status and Religion Across Their Distribution Range
Abstract
Effective conservation of large mammals depends on how people perceive them. Grey wolves have a widespread distribution globally, and their recent recolonization of human-dominated landscapes offers an excellent opportunity to understand the heterogeneity in their perception across continents. Our analysis included all quantitative studies (118 articles) conducted in 35 countries through a systematic review process, published globally between 1980-2023 and indexed in Web of Science and Google Scholar. Fifty-four percent of the studies reported a negative perception toward wolves. Most studies conducted in Asia reported a negative perception, while 56% of studies conducted in Europe and 48% in North America reported a positive perception. Fifty-four percent of studies from Western Europe and forty percent of studies from Slavic Russian cultural regions reported positive perceptions. Respondents from low-income countries elicited the most negative perceptions. We identified the predominant religion and economic status of a country as dominant factors determining perception. Studies conducted in countries with Hinduism as the predominant religion reported a negative perception toward wolves. We recommend that future studies on human-wolf interactions must prioritize regions within central Europe, parts of Asia, and Russia. A global human-wolf coexistence strategy should consider the social factors driving attitude toward the species.
Keywords: attitude; carnivore; coexistence; review; social drivers; tolerance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976-2012.Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):565-74. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12420. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Conserv Biol. 2015. PMID: 25412113
-
Wolves Recolonizing Islands: Genetic Consequences and Implications for Conservation and Management.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158911. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27384049 Free PMC article.
-
Plant-based remedies for wolf bites and rituals against wolves in the Iberian Peninsula: Therapeutic opportunities and cultural values for the conservation of biocultural diversity.J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Sep 14;209:124-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.07.038. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28755969 Review.
-
Deer, wolves, and people: costs, benefits and challenges of living together.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Jun;95(3):782-801. doi: 10.1111/brv.12587. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020. PMID: 32043747 Review.
-
Changing the Tolerance of the Intolerant: Does Large Carnivore Policy Matter?Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;14(16):2358. doi: 10.3390/ani14162358. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39199892 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Inskip C., Zimmermann A. Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx. 2009;43:18–34. doi: 10.1017/S003060530899030X. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources