Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 30;15(9):1272.
doi: 10.3390/ani15091272.

Weaning as Stressor for Calf Welfare

Affiliations

Weaning as Stressor for Calf Welfare

Cecilia Guasco et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Weaning is a critical period for calves, affecting their well-being, health, and productivity. The present study analyzed 61 calves to evaluate the effects of weaning as a stress factor by monitoring hematological, biochemical, and immune parameters. Blood samples were collected at the start of weaning at 130-135 days (T0), 3 (T1) and 7 (T2) days later, and finally at 150 days of age. The results showed changes in the levels of cortisol, inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, INF-γ and IL-8) and acute-phase proteins. Alterations in white blood cells were also observed, such as neutrophilia and lymphopenia, which are typical signs of an adverse stress response. Biochemically, the switch from milk to solid food caused imbalances in protein, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, indicating a relevant metabolic adaptation. Serum electrophoresis showed a decrease in albumin and an increase in γ-globulins, a sign of immune maturation. The results suggest that weaning is one of the most important stressors for calves, with both physiological and immune effects. However, this practice is necessary for breeding productivity. Future research could investigate the role of genetics and environment in weaning resilience to further optimize breeding practices.

Keywords: analysis; blood; calves; immune response; stress; weaning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Council F.A.W. Second Report on Priorities for Research and Development in Farm Animal Welfare. DEFRA; London, UK: 1993. pp. 187–205.
    1. Webster J. Animal Welfare: Freedoms, Dominions and “A Life Worth Living”. Animals. 2016;6:35. doi: 10.3390/ani6060035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webster J. Limping Towards Eden. John Wiley & Sons; New York, NY, USA: 2005.
    1. Mellor D., Reid C.S.W. Improving the Well-Being of Animals in the Research Environment. WellBeing International; Potomac, MD, USA: 1994. Concepts of Animal Well-Being and Predicting the Impact of Procedures on Experimental Animals.
    1. Mellor D.J. Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”. Animals. 2016;6:21. doi: 10.3390/ani6030021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources