Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 23;14(9):2915.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14092915.

Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience

Affiliations

Fast-Track Diagnostic Pathway for Lung Cancer Detection: Single-Center Experience

Valentina Tassi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Despite continuous advances in diagnosis, such as the "Two week wait" policy for hospital specialist referral and fast-track diagnostic pathways, lung cancers are detected mostly at advanced stages. Our aim was to evaluate the fast-track diagnostic pathway in a tertiary hospital. Methods: Between March and September 2022, 114 consecutive patients with respiratory symptoms or radiology suspicions of lung cancer were referred to our "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic. The time intervals to take in the charges and conduct biopsy and 18FDGPET-CT were prospectively collected. Furthermore, the patients' experiences were evaluated by means of a six-item questionnaire investigating the outpatient clinic environment and accessibility, the kindness and professional approach of the healthcare professionals, the psychological support provided and an overall evaluation. The data were compared with those of 79 patients observed in the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period of March-September 2019 before the fast-track diagnostic pathway for lung cancer was established. Results: The patients were referred to the "Pulmonary Point" outpatient clinic by a General Practitioner in 44 cases (38.5%), by other Specialists in 56 (49.1%) and by an Emergency Department in 14 (12.2%). Among the 114 patients, 104 (91.2%) were visited within 3 working days. Biopsies (FNAB, EBUS, bronchoscopy or surgical) were performed at a median period of 18 days (IQR: 9-26), and 18FDGPET-CT was carried out at a median period of 16 days (IQR: 7-25). The patients referred to the Thoracic Surgery Ambulatory in the period of March-September 2019 were characterized by longer times to biopsy [26 days (IQR: 12-54), p < 0.001] and to 18FDGPET-CT [25 days (IQR: 15-38), p = 0.003]. The patients referred in 2022 reported higher scores in the clinic environment (p < 0.001), psychological support provided (p < 0.001) and overall evaluation (p = 0.02) domains of the questionnaire. Conclusions: The establishment of a dedicated diagnostic pathway improves time to diagnosis and patients' satisfaction.

Keywords: diagnostic pathways; lung cancer early diagnosis; multidisciplinary team; patients’ satisfaction; time to 18FDGPET-CT; time to biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A). How patients with suspected lung cancer may access the Pulmonary Point outpatient clinic established in 2022 and start the fast-track diagnostic pathway. Pu.Po: Pulmonary Point outpatient clinic. (B). How patients with suspected lung cancer were referred to Hospital Specialists before the Pulmonary Point outpatient clinic access and the fast-track diagnostic pathway started.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fast-track diagnostic pathway for lung cancer detection. Pu.Po: Pulmonary Point outpatient clinic; EBUS: endobronchial ultrasound; EUS: Endoscopic Ultrasound; FNAB: Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; MDT: multidisciplinary team.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results of the Satisfaction Questionnaire investigating the outpatient clinic environment and accessibility, the kindness and professional approach of the healthcare professionals, the psychological support provided and overall satisfaction in the two groups of patients observed in 2022 (green bar) and in 2019 (orange bar). The scores for each domain ranged from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied). * p < 0.05.

References

    1. Petrella F., Rizzo S., Attili I., Passaro A., Zilli T., Martucci F., Bonomo L., Del Grande F., Casiraghi M., De Marinis F., et al. Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Treatment Options. Curr. Oncol. 2023;30:3160–3175. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantini L., Mentrasti G., Russo G.L., Signorelli D., Pasello G., Rijavec E., Russano M., Antonuzzo L., Rocco D., Giusti R., et al. Evaluation of COVID-19 impact on DELAYing diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of lung cancer patients in Italy (COVID-DELAY study): Fewer cases and higher stages from a real-world scenario. ESMO Open. 2022;7:100406. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100406. Erratum in: ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100471 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rusch V.W., Parekh K.R., Leon L., Venkatraman E., Bains M.S., Downey R.J., Boland P., Bilsky M., Ginsberg R.J. Factors determining outcome after surgical resection of T3 and T4 lung cancers of the superior sulcus. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000;119:1147–1153. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.106089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai J.S., Li Y., Yang F., Wang X. Investigation of the non-size-determined T4N0-2M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: What is the proper T category for the tumour with additional nodules in different lobes of ipsilateral lung? Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2023;64:ezad243. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad243. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guida A., Tassi V., Facchinetti F., Marchetti G., Caprera C., Ragusa M., Tiseo M., Bracarda S., Bracarda S. Ad hoc afatinib in an eldery lung cancer patient with EGFR exon 19 deletion L747-A750>P. Adv. Respir. Med. 2022;90:234–235. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2022.0034. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources