Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 25;14(9):2967.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14092967.

Initial Single-Center Experience with Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Case Series

Affiliations

Initial Single-Center Experience with Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Case Series

Antonio Vitiello et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of a preliminary single-center experience with Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (R-RYGB) using the Hugo™ Robotic-assisted Surgery system, focusing on operative time, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Methods: A retrospective review identified 19 consecutive patients who underwent R-RYGB with the Hugo™ system between January 2023 and January 2024. The baseline data collected were sex, age, and BMI. Key outcomes measured were operative time, docking time, length of hospital stay, conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery, reinterventions, readmissions, and intraoperative and early (<30 days) postoperative complications (bleeding, leak, and stenosis). Results: Nineteen patients underwent R-RYGB using the Hugo™ system. The mean age was 43.5 ± 10 years, and the mean BMI was 39.4 ± 2.9 kg/m2. Among these patients, 11 were female (57.9%); 3 had diabetes mellitus (15.8%), 3 had obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (15.8%), and 7 had hypercholesterolemia (36.8%). The mean operative time was 177.8 ± 34.7 min, with a mean docking time of 12.5 ± 4.6 min. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.2 days. There were no intraoperative complications, conversions, reinterventions, readmissions, or 30-day postoperative complications. All procedures were completed uneventfully. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience suggests that R-RYGB using the Hugo™ Robotic-assisted Surgery system is safe and feasible, with acceptable operative and docking times and no perioperative complications.

Keywords: Hugo robotic-assisted surgery system; RYGB; robotic bariatric surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trocars position.

References

    1. Angrisani L., Santonicola A., Iovino P., Vitiello A., Zundel N., Buchwald H., Scopinaro N.J.O. Bariatric Surgery and Endoluminal Procedures: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2014. Obes. Surg. 2017;27:2279–2289. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2666-x. Erratum in: Obes. Surg. 2017, 27, 2290–2292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2773-8 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. [(accessed on 1 March 2025)]. Available online: https://www.ifso.com/pdf/8th-ifso-registry-report-2023.pdf.
    1. [(accessed on 1 March 2025)]. Available online: https://www.sicob.org/00_materiali/area_medici/indagine/indagine_2024.pdf.
    1. De Luca M., Zese M., Bandini G., Zappa M.A., Bardi U., Carbonelli M.G., Carrano F.M., Casella G., Chianelli M., Chiappetta S., et al. SICOB Italian clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of obesity and associated diseases using GRADE methodology on bariatric and metabolic surgery. Updat. Surg. 2024 doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01996-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao S., Fu Y., Zhou J., Sun L., Li R., Tian Z., Cheng Y., Wang J., Wang W., Wang D. Comparing the Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes. Surg. 2024;34:3493–3505. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07413-z. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources