Efficacy and Safety of XEN63 Gel Stent Implant over 6 Months for Treatment of Glaucoma
- PMID: 40364068
- PMCID: PMC12072967
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14093036
Efficacy and Safety of XEN63 Gel Stent Implant over 6 Months for Treatment of Glaucoma
Abstract
Background/objectives: The efficacy and safety of the XEN45 gel stent implant in patients with glaucoma have been amply demonstrated. XEN63 is a new device that has been developed with a larger bore. This multicenter, observational, retrospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of XEN63 in patients with glaucoma. Methods: Medical records from six participating centers were screened to identify patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was mean IOP at 6 months after surgery. Results: The study included 114 eyes from 102 patients (XEN63 alone: 68 eyes, and XEN63 + Phaco: 46 eyes); 92% of patients had primary open-angle glaucoma. Baseline IOP for all patients was a median of 23.0 mmHg (IQR: 18.5-27.5 mmHg), which decreased significantly on day one post-surgery to 7.0 mmHg (IQR: 4.5-9.5 mmHg) and gradually stabilized at around 13.5 mmHg (IQR: 10.5-16.5 mmHg) by 6 months with no significant differences between groups at 6 months. The number of ocular hypertensive medications (OHMs) reduced significantly from a baseline median of 2.7 ± 1.1 to 0.5 ± 1.0 at 6 months in the entire cohort. The XEN63 alone group showed a significantly lower need for OHMs at 3 and 6 months. The surgical success rate was comparable between the two groups (54.4% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.05, XEN63 alone and XEN63 + Phaco). There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between the XEN63 (0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.73) and XEN63 + Phaco groups (0.55, 95% CI: 0.42-0.72) (p = 0.89). Conclusions: In the largest study with XEN63 to date, the device appears to significantly decrease the IOP and the OHMs. Simultaneous XEN63 implant and phacoemulsification showed similar outcomes compared to XEN63 alone.
Keywords: XEN63 gel stent; glaucoma; therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Boland M.V., Ervin A.M., Friedman D.S., Jampel H.D., Hawkins B.S., Vollenweider D., Chelladurai Y., Ward D., Suarez-Cuervo C., Robinson K.A. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013;158:271–279. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00008. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., Guire K.E., Janz N.K., Wren P.A., Mills R.P., CIGTS Study Group Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1943–1953. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00873-9. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
