Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug 1;46(7):802-808.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004518. Epub 2025 May 14.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Electrode Array

Robert J S Briggs, Timothy McLean  1 , Alexandra Rousset  1 , Sylvia Tari  1 , Stephen J O'Leary, Richard C Dowell, Jaime Leigh, Robert Cowan  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Electrode Array

Robert J S Briggs et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare outcomes of adult cochlear implant recipients receiving either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.

Study design: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate final electrode array position, speech perception, and vestibular symptoms.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: One hundred forty-four adults were assessed for the study. Inclusion criteria were bilateral postlingual severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with 500-Hz threshold in the implant ear of 75 dB HL or greater.

Interventions: Subjects were randomized to receive either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative electrode array position was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Speech perception was measured preoperatively in best-aided conditions, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Vestibular symptoms were assessed using two self-reported questionnaires and/or clinician reports.

Results: Postoperative speech perception results for 124 implants in 123 adults showed significant improvement from preoperative scores and from 3 to 12 months postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis indicated no significant effect of electrode array position for any speech perception results at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Auditory alone, monosyllabic word, and phoneme scores at 12 months were 48.4 and 71.4% for lateral wall electrode arrays and 49.8% and 72.0% for perimodiolar electrode arrays, respectively. No relationships between angle (depth) of electrode array insertion and speech perception outcomes were detected. There was no significant difference in incidence of vestibular symptoms between the groups.

Conclusions: Correct scala tympani placement of either the perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays used in this study provides excellent speech perception outcomes, with no significant difference demonstrated between groups.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; Lateral wall electrode; Perimodiolar electrode; Speech perception; Vestibular symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sources of support and disclosure of funding: R.J.S.B.—consultant for Cochlear Ltd.; S.J.O.—presenter funded by Cochlear Ltd. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Hearnet and The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital did not receive any support from Cochlear Ltd. for this study. The University of Melbourne does receive support from Cochlear Ltd., but not for this study.

References

    1. Boisvert I, Reis M, Au A, Cowan R, Dowell RC. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review. PloS One 2020;15:e0232421.
    1. Dowell RC. Evidence about the effectiveness of cochlear implants for adults. In: Wong LW, Hickson LH, eds. Evidence Based Practice in Audiology: Evaluating Interventions for Children and Adults With Hearing Impairment . San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2012:141–66.
    1. Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: An update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol 2013;18:36–47.
    1. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:342–60.
    1. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, et al. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:920–8.

Publication types