Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039480.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039480. Epub 2025 May 14.

Contemporary Safety of Ultrasound Enhancing Agents in a Nationwide Analysis

Affiliations

Contemporary Safety of Ultrasound Enhancing Agents in a Nationwide Analysis

Jordan B Strom et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) are an important diagnostic tool for transthoracic or stress echocardiography (TTE/SE) but recent concerns have been raised about their safety in reports from individual health systems. As such, we aimed to identify if UEAs for TTE/SE are associated with serious adverse events within 2 days of administration.

Methods and results: All-payor nationwide claims from 11.4 million insured individuals across the United States, 2018 to 2022 were used to evaluate rates of death, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia, or cardiac arrest within 2 days of TTE/SE among adults receiving and not receiving UEAs. Of the 11 421 463 individuals included (mean age 57.5±16.2, 54.0% female, 46.2% White), a total of 500 073 (4.4%) received TTE/SE with UEAs. After propensity score matching, the odds of death were lower in those receiving UEAs (receipt versus nonreceipt, 0.02% versus 0.14%, odds ratio [OR], 0.23 [95% CI, 0.19-0.28], P<0.001) and were not different across agents (Definity: 0.02%, OR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.18-0.28]; Lumason: 0.03%, OR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57]; Optison: 0.01%, OR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.08-0.38]; all P < 0.001). Rates of nondeath outcomes were similar to those observed in individuals not receiving UEAs, overall, and across specific agents. Rates of all outcomes were stable across years, including considering pre- and post-COVID periods.

Conclusions: In this large nationwide claims analysis from 2018 to 2022, serious adverse events associated with UEAs for TTE/SE were uncommon and overall consistent across agents and years of study. Compared with nonreceipt, receipt of UEAs was associated with a lower odds of death within 2 days of TTE/SE.

Keywords: adverse events; claims; echocardiography; safety; ultrasound enhancing agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jordan B. Strom additionally reports grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (1R01HL169517, 1R01HL173998, 1R01AG063937), Anumana, EVERSANA Lifesciences, Bracco Diagnostics, and Philips Healthcare, consulting for Bracco Diagnostics, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and EVERSANA Lifesciences. Jordan B. Strom additionally reports scientific advisory board roles for Ultromics, HeartSciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Alnyam, Ultrasight, and EchoIQ and is on a clinical end point committee for Pfizer. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow chart.
Shown is a flow chart demonstrating study inclusion and exclusion criteria. The numbers of individuals excluded for each reason are not mutually exclusive. NDC indicates National Drug Code; PS, propensity score; TTE/SE, transthoracic echocardiography or stress echocardiography; and UEA, ultrasound enhancing agents.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Love plot demonstrating imbalances between groups before and after propensity score matching.
Shown are the standardized mean differences in baseline covariates between groups receiving and not receiving ultrasound enhancing agents both before propensity score matching (crude; white diamond) and after (matched; black circle). Vertical hashed lines indicate the standardized mean difference thresholds above and below which a group is considered to be imbalanced. In general, the plot results indicate that the groups are well balanced after matching. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; ED, emergency department; Ins., insurance; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and SOC, setting of care.

Comment in

References

    1. Fraiche AM, Strom JB. Impact of ultrasound enhancing agents on clinical management. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022;37:389–393. doi: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:797–810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Belcik JT, Bierig M, Choy J, Gaibazzi N, Gillam LD, Janardhanan R, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:241–274. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.11.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurt M, Shaikh KA, Peterson L, Kurrelmeyer KM, Shah G, Nagueh SF, Fromm R, Quinones MA, Zoghbi WA. Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:802–810. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee KC, Liu S, Callahan P, Green T, Jarrett T, Cochran JD, Mei Y, Mobasseri S, Sayegh H, Rangarajan V, et al. Routine use of contrast on admission transthoracic echocardiography for heart failure reduces the rate of repeat echocardiography during index admission. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021;34:1253–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2021.07.008 - DOI - PubMed