Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct 1;241(4):535-549.
doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001444. Epub 2025 Sep 16.

Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of Outcomes of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction after Premastectomy and Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

Mark V Schaverien et al. J Am Coll Surg. .

Abstract

Background: This study compared complication rates and outcomes between patients who underwent premastectomy radiation therapy (Pre-MRT) followed by mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR) and patients who underwent mastectomy followed by postmastectomy RT (PMRT) then microsurgical delayed breast reconstruction (DBR).

Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (NCT02912312) that randomized patients with breast cancer to receive hypofractionated (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy in 25 fractions) regional nodal irradiation between August 2018 and August 2022. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of autologous flap loss. Secondary outcomes included rates of other recipient-site complications.

Results: A total of 144 patients were included: 41 underwent Pre-MRT with IMBR and 103 underwent PMRT with DBR, including 66 patients who had tissue expander (TE) placement at the time of mastectomy and 37 who underwent total mastectomy. The median time from mastectomy to DBR was 12.8 months (interquartile range 9.7 to 16.3 months). There were no complete autologous flap losses in either group, and rates of other recipient-site complications were similar between the groups. Infection at the recipient site occurred in 20% (13 of 66) of patients in the PMRT group who underwent TE placement, and 9 (14%) required TE explantation because of complications.

Conclusions: Pre-MRT with microvascular IMBR is associated with a similar complication rate to PMRT with microvascular DBR while avoiding complications relating to TE placement and a reduced time to achieve definitive breast reconstruction. A larger randomized clinical trial of Pre-MRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR is currently underway (NCT05774678).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zugasti A, Hontanilla B. The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate implant-based breast reconstruction surgical and satisfaction outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3910.
    1. Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, et al. What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:1509–1517.
    1. Liew B, Southall C, Kanapathy M, Nikkhah D. Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74:3260–3280.
    1. O’Donnell JPM, Murphy D, Ryan EJ, et al. Optimal reconstructive strategies in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy—a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:2797–2806.
    1. Hershenhouse KS, Bick K, Shauly O, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74:931–944.

Publication types

Associated data