Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 8;30(5):oyaf088.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088.

Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan

Affiliations

Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan

Anna Amela Valsecchi et al. Oncologist. .

Abstract

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.

Methods: This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.

Results: In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.

Conclusions: The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.

Keywords: Delphi; adverse events; breast cancer; consensus; guidelines; mTNBC; management; sacituzumab govitecan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors A.A.V., A.A., R.G., L.P., and D.S., declare no conflicts of interest; S.P.: Daichii, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Gentili, Sophos, Seagen, Novartis, Roche (speaker), Gilead, AstraZeneca (investigator); G.A.: Novartis, Lilly (personal fees), Roche (grants and personal fees), Pfizer, AstraZeneca (personal fees, and nonfinancial support), Daichi (personal fees); G.B.: AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, EISAI, Gilead, Menarini/Stemline, Exact Science, Seagen, Helsinn, Takeda (consultancy/honorarium/advisory role), Gilead (Institutional fee for research grant); L.B.: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Lilly, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, SeaGen (honoraria, consultancy or advisory role), Celgene, Genomic Health, Novartis (Institutional financial interests), AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo (travel grant); G.F.C.: C.C.: AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen (Consulting/Advisory role/speaker); A.F.: Astra Zeneca, Dompè Biotech, Eisai, Exact Science, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sophos, Seagen; R.D.: Roche, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, EUSA Pharma (scientific advisory board, consulting relationship), Ipsen, Sanofi Genzyme (travel, accommodation, expenses); A.F.: M.D.M.: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Merck, Takeda, Viatris, Ipsen, Astellas (consultancy or participation to advisory boards).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the methodology design including editorial project, data collection, and final consensus paper definition; * Statements that did not reach 75% in the first round were subjected to a second round of voting.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sriramulu S, Thoidingjam S, Speers C, Nyati S.. Present and future of immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers. 2024;16:3250. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193250 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M, Loibl S.. Chemotherapy in older patients with early breast cancer. Breast. 2024;78:103821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2024.103821 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quintana A, Saini KS, Vidal L, et al.Window of opportunity trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2024;9:103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103713 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams E, Wildiers H, Neven P, Punie K.. Sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan: two new antibody-drug conjugates in the breast cancer treatment landscape. ESMO Open. 2021;6:100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michaleas S, Moreno Oliver A, Mueller-Berghaus J, et al.The European Medicines Agency review of sacituzumab govitecan for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2022;7:100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100497 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding