Allyship in Healthcare for People With Learning Disabilities as a Praxis of Respect, Attention and Collaborative Action
- PMID: 40367118
- PMCID: PMC12077749
- DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.70047
Allyship in Healthcare for People With Learning Disabilities as a Praxis of Respect, Attention and Collaborative Action
Abstract
There is a dearth of literature focusing on how allyship in health may be enacted in relation to people with learning disabilities (LD). This is concerning, because people with LD are vulnerable to health inequalities and forms of medical dehumanisation including do-not-resuscitate orders, diagnostic overshadowing and overprescription of psychotropic drugs. Deploying critical disability studies as a lens through which to understand disability, this paper reviews models of disability allyship developed in healthcare, research and theatre. In doing so it advocates transformative allyship as a model that can both animate action in support of people with learning disabilities and accommodate the involvement of others, including clinicians, carers and relatives, without compromising the all-important commitment to supporting disability cultures. The paper presents and analyses ethnographic data gained through observations of eleven healthcare appointments between seven clinicians and five patients with LD, undertaken as part of the ESRC-funded study Humanising Healthcare. It documents the potential of transformative allyship in healthcare to transform harmful disablist practices through emphasising respect, attention and collaborative action while also noting that broader structural conditions and diagnostic technologies limit the extent to which clinicians can enact transformative allyship.
Keywords: allyship; disability allyship; disability allyship in healthcare; intellectual disability; learning disability.
© 2025 The Author(s). Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38940476
-
Approaches used to prevent and reduce the use of restrictive practices on adults with learning disabilities: a realist review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(14):1-64. doi: 10.3310/PGAS1755. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40326249 Review.
-
Infusing disability equity within rehabilitation education and practice: A qualitative study of lived experiences of ableism, allyship, and healthcare partnership.Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 2;3:947592. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.947592. eCollection 2022. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022. PMID: 36188899 Free PMC article.
-
Transitions for older people with learning disabilities and behaviours that challenge others, and their family carers: a merged protocol for two rapid scoping reviews of evidence.Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 18;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01883-3. Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35042546 Free PMC article.
-
Health inequalities for people with learning disabilities: why it matters and what emergency physicians need to know.Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Feb 2;85(2):1-7. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0357. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38416523
References
-
- Adams, H. 2015. “Scope and Prevalence of the Problem.” In Comorbid Conditions in Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities, edited by Matson J. and Matson M., 3–24. Springer. https://link‐springer‐com.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/chapter/10.1007/978‐3‐.... - DOI
-
- Barnes, C. 2004. “Emancipatory Disability Research’: Project or Process?” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2, no. 1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471‐3802.2002.00157.x. - DOI
-
- Barnes, C. 2013. “Understanding the Social Model of Disability: Past, Present and Future.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Watson N., Roulstone A., and Thomas C., 12–29. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/.
-
- Beart, S. , Hardy G., and Buchan L.. 2005. “How People With Intellectual Disabilities View Their Social Identity: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18, no. 1: 47–56. 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00218.x. - DOI
-
- Bloom‐Christen, A. , and Grunow H.. 2022. “What’s (In) a Vignette? History, Functions, and Development of an Elusive Ethnographic Sub‐Genre.” Ethnos: 1–19. 10.1080/00141844.2022.2052927. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials