Clinical, sociodemographic, and facility-related determinants of immunotherapy use in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
- PMID: 40369346
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07725-3
Clinical, sociodemographic, and facility-related determinants of immunotherapy use in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), yet factors influencing its adoption remain unclear. This study examines clinical, sociodemographic, and facility-related determinants of immunotherapy use in mTNBC patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mTNBC patients from the NCDB (2015-2020), categorizing them into immunotherapy recipients and non-recipients. Patients with missing data on key variables were excluded. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors influencing immunotherapy adoption. Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank tests assessed overall survival.
Results: Among 1,887 mTNBC patients, 232 (12.2%) received immunotherapy. Factors positively associated with immunotherapy use included later diagnosis year (2018-2020: OR 5.35, p < 0.001), academic facilities (OR 1.43, p = 0.044), and private insurance (OR 1.34, p < 0.001). Lower likelihood of immunotherapy use was observed in older age (71+: OR 0.49, p = 0.019), rural facilities (OR 0.43, p = 0.042), Black race (OR 0.73, p = 0.039), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.53, p = 0.026), and higher Charlson comorbidity scores (≥ 2: OR 0.31, p = 0.035). Immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival (median 2.21 vs. 1.01 years, log-rank p < 0.001) and reduced mortality risk (HR 0.59, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Immunotherapy use in mTNBC has increased in recent years, with clinical, sociodemographic, and facility-related factors influencing its adoption. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing disparities in access to immunotherapy to ensure equitable treatment and better survival outcomes for all mTNBC patients.
Keywords: Disparities in treatment access; Immunotherapy; Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC); Survival outcomes.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This is a retrospective observational study using a publicly available database. Our institutional Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required. Consent to participate: This research used data from a deidentified publicly available database, so no informed consent to participate was needed. Consent to publication: This research used data from a deidentified publicly available database, so no informed consent to publish was needed.
Similar articles
-
Clinical, Sociodemographic, and Facility-Related Factors Influencing HER2-Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Negative, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 6;17(9):1579. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091579. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361505 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral blood eosinophil count is associated with response to chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.Immunotherapy. 2022 Mar;14(4):189-199. doi: 10.2217/imt-2021-0149. Epub 2022 Jan 5. Immunotherapy. 2022. PMID: 34984928
-
Survival, treatment regimens and medical costs of women newly diagnosed with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):729. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04316-2. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35031634 Free PMC article.
-
Platinum-containing regimens for triple-negative metastatic breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):CD013750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013750. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33084020 Free PMC article.
-
Current treatment landscape for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic literature review.Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 16;21(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1210-4. Breast Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31842957 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Huppert LA, Gumusay O, Rugo HS (2022) Emerging treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 7(14):17588359221086916. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221086916 - DOI
-
- Li CH, Karantza V, Aktan G, Lala M (2019) Current treatment landscape for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic literature review. Breast Cancer Res 21(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1210-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Won KA, Spruck C (2020) Triple-negative breast cancer therapy: Current and future perspectives (Review). Int J Oncol 57(6):1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2020.5135 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Maqbool M, Bekele F, Fekadu G (2022) Treatment strategies against triple-negative breast cancer: an updated review. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 11(14):15–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S348060 - DOI
-
- Yao H, He G, Yan S, Chen C, Song L, Rosol TJ, Deng X (2017) Triple-negative breast cancer: is there a treatment on the horizon? Oncotarget 8(1):1913–1924. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12284 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources