Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 14;25(1):338.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06009-1.

Impact of multidimensional assessment on anti-fracture treatment decisions in patients with fragility hip fractures within a Fracture Liaison Service

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of multidimensional assessment on anti-fracture treatment decisions in patients with fragility hip fractures within a Fracture Liaison Service

Chiara Ceolin et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is a chronic condition characterized by increased fracture risk. Fragility fractures, especially hip fractures, represent a significant health and economic burden due to population aging. Despite the efficacy of approved treatments in lowering fracture recurrence, post-fracture treatment rates remain suboptimal. To address these issues, various post-fracture care programs, including Fracture Liaison Services (FLS), have been implemented worldwide. While FLS models effectively reduce refracture risk and maintain cost-effectiveness, it is unclear if these benefits apply equally to all patients, especially those with higher comorbidities and reduced functional capacity, who may face worse prognoses. This study aimed to identify the primary factors influencing anti-fracture therapy decisions in older patients with fragility fractures, using a multidimensional geriatric assessment approach integrated into our FLS program.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 65 and above with hip fractures admitted to Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova. Patients were categorized based on anti-fracture treatment (bisphosphonates, Denosumab, anabolic agents) or calcium/vitamin D supplements only. Clinical data, including the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) and its components, were collected. Statistical comparisons between treated and untreated groups were made, and a CHAID decision tree was used to explore decision-influencing factors.

Results: The study included 493 patients (average age 84.7 years, 71.8% female). Patients receiving anti-fracture treatment were notably younger, with only 11.2% classified as MPI class 3 (severe prognosis) compared to 60.8% of untreated patients (p < 0.001). Among treated patients (n = 427), 75.3% received bisphosphonates, 7.3% Denosumab, and 2.2% anabolic agents. The CHAID decision tree highlighted MPI class as the primary determinant of treatment, with functional autonomy (Instrumental Activity of Daily Living or IADL) and cognitive status as subsequent factors, leading to an overall prediction accuracy of 70%.

Conclusion: The integration of the MPI into multidisciplinary taking care of old patients with hip fractures may provide a structured approach for individualizing treatment decisions, considering aspects such as prognosis, functional autonomy, and cognitive status. Further studies are needed to validate the long-term outcomes of this approach.

Keywords: Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Fracture liaison service; Fragility hip fractures; Multidimensional prognostic index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and was authorized by the local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Territoriale Area Centro-Est Veneto, 442n/AO/23). The committee provided ethical approval for the research protocol, ensuring that the study complies with the ethical standards for research involving human participants. All participants provided written informed consent after being fully informed about the study’s nature, purpose, and procedures. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment Distribution by MPI Class. MPI: Multidimensional Prognostic Index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CHAID Decision Tree depicting the multifaceted decision pathway for optimizing patient therapy selection, incorporating considerations of treatment types including Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, and other anabolic agents. CHAID: Chi-square automatic interaction detection
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CHAID Decision Tree illustrating the role of cognitive function in selecting anti-fracture therapy, including Bisphosphonates, Denosumab, and Anabolic agents. CHAID: Chi-square automatic interaction detection

References

    1. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int a J Establ as result Coop between Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA. 1997;7(Suppl 3):S108–16. - PubMed
    1. Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G, Norton N, Halbout P, Cooper C, et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch Osteoporos. 2020;15(1):59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018;49(8):1458–60. - PubMed
    1. Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ, Kuramoto L, Guy P. Risk of second hip fracture persists for years after initial trauma. Bone. 2015;75:72–6. - PubMed
    1. Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ, Kuramoto L, Guy P. Excess mortality associated with second hip fracture. Osteoporos Int a J Establ as result Coop between Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA. 2015;26(7):1903–10. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources