Atherogenic lipid parameters in people with normal glucose tolerance: implications from elevated 1-hour post-load plasma glucose

Abstract

Background: Existing evidence suggests that elevated 1-hour post-load plasma glucose (1-h PG ≥ 8.6 mmol/L) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is associated with atherogenic lipid parameters which are linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, it remains unclear whether normal glucose tolerance (NGT) individuals with elevated 1-h PG (NGT-1hPG-high) should still be considered low-risk. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate comprehensive lipid characteristics in individuals with different glycemic status stratified by 1-h PG, with a particular focus on those with NGT-1hPG-high.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included individuals aged 25-55 years with high-risk of diabetes from the Daqing Diabetes Prevention Study II (Daqing DPS-II). Individuals were categorized into different glycemic status based on the World Health Organization's 1999 criteria and the International Diabetes Federation's 2024 position statement on 1-h PG. Traditional (TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C) and non-traditional lipid parameters [ApoA-1, ApoB, sdLDL-C, Lp(a), non-HDL-C, remnant cholesterol (RC), ApoB/ApoA-1, LDL-C/ApoB] were measured. Dyslipidemia was defined according to the 2023 Chinese Guidelines for Lipid Management. The China-PAR equation was used to estimate 10-year CVD risk. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the correlation between lipid parameters and 10-year CVD risk. Logistic and multiple linear regression models were performed to assess the association between 1-h PG and dyslipidemia as well as lipid parameters adjusting for covariates.

Results: Among 2 469 individuals, 22.7% had NGT with normal 1-h PG (NGT-1hPG-normal), 19.9% had NGT-1hPG-high, 2.6% had prediabetes with normal 1-h PG (PDM-1hPG-normal), 34.2% had prediabetes with elevated 1-h PG (PDM-1hPG-high), and 20.6% had newly diagnosed diabetes. The prevalence of dyslipidemia did not significantly differ between NGT-1hPG-high and PDM-1hPG-high (OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.88-1.44, P > 0.05). Higher 1-h PG levels were consistently associated with an atherogenic lipid profile, characterized by increased TC, TG, LDL-C, ApoB, sdLDL-C, non-HDL-C, RC and ApoB/ApoA-1, along with decreased ApoA-1, HDL-C and LDL-C/ApoB (all P < 0.05). Among lipid parameters, TG, sdLDL-C, RC, ApoB/ApoA-1, LDL-C/ApoB and HDL-C showed the strongest correlation with 10-year CVD risk, with Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0.41, 0.38, 0.35, 0.31, - 0.37 and - 0.36, respectively. In the NGT-1hPG-high, TG, sdLDL-C, and ApoB/ApoA-1 levels were significantly higher, while HDL-C and LDL-C/ApoB levels were significantly lower compared to counterparts with NGT-1hPG-normal (all P < 0.05). Moreover, except for TG and RC (both P < 0.01), the majority of lipid parameter levels in NGT-1hPG-high did not significantly differ from those in PDM (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: NGT-1hPG-high exhibited a similar atherogenic lipid profile to that observed in PDM. 1-h PG could serve as a potential indicator for the early identification of at-risk individuals who may otherwise go undetected among NGT population.

Keywords: 1-hour post-load plasma glucose; Cardiovascular disease; Diabetes; Dyslipidemia; Lipid parameters.

Fig. 1

Correlation between lipid parameters and 10-year CVD risk. This heatmap displays the Spearman’s correlation coefficients between lipid parameters and 10-year CVD risk. The color gradient represents the strength and direction of correlations, where red indicates positive correlations and green indicates negative correlations

Fig. 2

Comparisons of lipid level among different glycemic status. Box plots showed the median and interquartile range (IQR). Group differences were assessed using a general linear model adjusted for covariates (age, gender, education, occupation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, GDR score, physical activity level, BMI, LLDs use and hypertension) with post-hoc Bonferroni correction. ns = no significant difference; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001