Digital Health Literacy in Patients With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 40369694
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17811
Digital Health Literacy in Patients With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Aim: To assess Digital Health Literacy (DHL) levels among hypertensive patients.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: The study, conducted from March to August 2024 among hypertensive patients using convenience sampling, employed a 35-item questionnaire assessing: (I) sociodemographic; (II) physical activity, dietary habits, antihypertensive pharmacological treatment and medical history; (III) online health-related information knowledge and confidence; (IV) DHL, through the HLS19-DIGI questionnaire with subscales on: (i) dealing with digital health information (HL-DIGI), (ii) interaction with digital resources (HL-DIGI-INT), (iii) frequency of digital device use for health (HL-DIGI-DD).
Results: Among 311 participants (mean age 63.9 years, SD = 14.8), 42.1% completed high school, 25.4% held a bachelor's degree and 22.8% were physically inactive. While 49.8% were aware of online health-related information, 28.9% were uncertain and 47.6% lacked confidence in using it for health decisions. On average, participants showed a problematic level of DHL in HL-DIGI, a sufficient level in HL-DIGI-INT, and used digital health devices just over once a week. Older age emerged as a predictor of higher online health-related knowledge and DHL, while higher education level predicted higher knowledge, confidence and DHL. Physical inactivity was associated with lower online health-related information knowledge and confidence.
Conclusions: These findings point to the need to design proactive strategies and implement targeted training and educational interventions to improve DHL in hypertensive patients.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Enhancing DHL levels through targeted interventions in patient care allows patients to effectively benefit from digital healthcare, achieve positive health outcomes and reduce disparities in care pathways.
Reporting method: This study adhered to the STROBE checklist for reporting.
Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved as the study population.
Protocol registration: Local Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Company of the Marche Region, Italy (protocol: 2023/279, date: 28/09/2023).
Keywords: blood pressure; digital health literacy; digital technology; hypertension; nursing; patient education; telehealth.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- Alessa, T., S. Abdi, M. S. Hawley, and L. de Witte. 2018. “Mobile Apps to Support the Self‐Management of Hypertension: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Usability, and User Satisfaction.” JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, no. 7: e10723. https://doi.org/10.2196/10723.
-
- Alkan, Ö., U. Küçükoğlu, and Ş. Ünver. 2024. “Comparison of Factors Affecting Turkish Citizens' Search for Online Health Information Before and During the COVID‐19 Pandemic.” BMC Public Health 24: 2054. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889‐024‐19546‐y.
-
- Arias López, M. D. P., B. A. Ong, X. Borrat Frigola, et al. 2023. “Digital Literacy as a New Determinant of Health: A Scoping Review.” PLOS Digital Health 2, no. 10: e0000279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279.
-
- Careum for HLS19. 2020. HLS19‐DIGI‐CH_Italian—The Swiss HLS19 Instrument for Measuring Digital Health Literacy in the General Population. M‐POHL.
-
- Chandrasekaran, R., P. Sharma, and E. Moustakas. 2023. “Exploring Disparities in Healthcare Wearable Use Among Cardiovascular Patients: Findings From a National Survey.” Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine 24, no. 11: 307. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2411307.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources