Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 May;30(5):e70046.
doi: 10.1111/nep.70046.

Non-Inferiority of Subcutaneous Efepoetin Alfa Compared to Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta in Stage 3 or 4 CKD Patients: Insights From a Phase 3 Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Non-Inferiority of Subcutaneous Efepoetin Alfa Compared to Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta in Stage 3 or 4 CKD Patients: Insights From a Phase 3 Trial

Simon D Roger et al. Nephrology (Carlton). 2025 May.

Abstract

Aim: Efepoetin alfa, a novel long-acting erythropoietin (EPO)-hybrid Fc fusion protein, represents a promising erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) for addressing anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This Phase 3 trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous efepoetin alfa in comparison to subcutaneous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in stage 3 or 4 CKD patients.

Methods: A randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase 3 trial enrolled 391 CKD stage 3 or stage 4 patients. Subjects underwent a 20-week correction period followed by an 8-week evaluation period. Responders continued treatment for an extra 24-week extension to evaluate long-term safety, maintenance effectiveness, and the longer treatment interval.

Results: In the efepoetin alfa Q2W (every 2 weeks) group, the response rate was 75.6%; while in the methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta Q2W group, the response rate was 69.3%. The difference in the response rate was 6.3% with 95% CI (confidence interval) -3.1% to 15.5%. The lower limit of the 95% CI was above the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -9.0%. Adverse event rates were comparable between the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Efepoetin alfa demonstrated non-inferiority to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in correcting anaemia and maintaining haemoglobin (Hb) levels among stage 3 and 4 CKD patients. Moreover, the safety profile of efepoetin alfa was comparable to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta.

Keywords: anaemia; chronic kidney disease; efepoetin alfa; long‐acting erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Simon Roger has received speaker's fee and consultancy fees from Kalbe Genexine Biologics, and I‐Wen Wu has received consultancy from Innogene Kalbiotech Pte Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design. efepoetin alfa Q2W, twice‐monthly continuous efepoetin alfa; methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta Q2W, twice‐monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta; efepoetin alfa Q4W, once‐monthly efepoetin alfa; methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta Q4W, once‐monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta; R, randomization.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Patient disposition. Q2W, once every 2 weeks; Q4W, once every 4 weeks; ITT, intent‐to‐treat; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat; EXT‐mITT, extension modified intent‐to‐treat; PP, per‐protocol; EXT‐PP, extension per‐protocol.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean haemoglobin (SD) values during correction and evaluation period (A) and extension period (B) with efepoetin alfa and methoxy polyethylene glycol‐epoetin beta. 2 W, once every 2 weeks; 4 W, once every 4 weeks; SD, standard deviation.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The percentage of the patients who had a Hb overshoot (Hb > 12 g/dL). Q2W, once every 2 weeks.

References

    1. Hill N. R., Fatoba S. T., Oke J. L., et al., “Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” PLoS One 11, no. 7 (2016): e0158765, 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bikbov B., Purcell C. A., Levey A. S., et al., “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease, 1990–2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017,” Lancet 395, no. 10225 (2020): 709–733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darlington O., Dickerson C., Evans M., et al., “Costs and Healthcare Resource Use Associated With Risk of Cardiovascular Morbidity in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Evidence From a Systematic Literature Review,” Advances in Therapy 38 (2021): 994–1010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovesdy C. P., Davis J. R., Duling I., and Little D. J., “Prevalence of Anaemia in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease in a Representative Sample of the United States Population: Analysis of the 1999‐2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 16, no. 2 (2022): 303–311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovesdy C. P., Trivedi B. K., Kalantar‐Zadeh K., and Anderson J. E., “Association of Anaemia With Outcomes in Men With Moderate and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease,” Kidney International 69, no. 3 (2006): 560–564. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding