Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;380(1926):20240199.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0199. Epub 2025 May 15.

Domestication effects on crowing in chickens: variation between wild and captive red junglefowl and domestic white Leghorn and the genetic architecture of crowing vocalizations

Affiliations

Domestication effects on crowing in chickens: variation between wild and captive red junglefowl and domestic white Leghorn and the genetic architecture of crowing vocalizations

Dominic Wright et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 May.

Abstract

The crowing of the male chicken is a charismatic example of vocal display in a bird. It is regarded as the main territorial announcement of the ancestral red junglefowl. The call has been preserved throughout domestication, although several of its elements have been altered. To assess these alterations, we assayed crowing spectrograms from wild and captive-held red junglefowl populations from India, along with two red junglefowl populations held in long-term captivity in Sweden, and a domestic white Leghorn breed. We find consistent differences between the different Indian red junglefowl and the domestic white Leghorn for a range of characteristics, including the duration of the last syllable and the number of formants and their frequency in the last and second-to-last syllable. To analyse the genetic architecture of crowing vocalization, we performed a quantitative trait loci (QTL) experiment using a wild × domestic advanced intercross to identify QTL that explained a large percentage of the variation present for the duration of the last syllable and the number of formants in the second to last syllable. With this study we thus demonstrate consistent differences in red junglefowl and white Leghorn chickens and identify a relatively simple genetic architecture for some of these traits.This article is part of the theme issue 'Unravelling domestication: multi-disciplinary perspectives on human and non-human relationships in the past, present and future'.

Keywords: crowing; domestication; quantitative trait locus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Breakdown of crowing vocalisation measurements.
Figure 1.
Breakdown of crowing vocalization measurements. This sample figure illustrates the phenotypes measured from each vocalization. Orange lines are used to mark the number of syllables present in each (in this illustration, four syllables are present). The duration of the last syllable is marked in pink and measured in seconds. The number of formants of the last syllable is indicated with a blue arrow, with this arrow indicating one of the formants. The same measurement is also applied to the second-to-last syllable. The most distinct formant of the last and second-to-last syllables is calculated in Hertz and is calculated using the darkest (most prominent) average trace in the particular syllable (in this case, 1200 Hz).
(A) Epistatic interaction for last syllable duration QTL 1@791 and 7@173, AA = RJF genotype, AB = heterozygote genotype, BB = WL genotype.
Figure 2.
(A) Epistatic interaction for last syllable duration QTL 1@791 and 7@173. AA, RJF genotype; AB, heterozygote genotype; BB, WL genotype. (B) Epistatic interaction for last syllable duration number of formants in second-to-last syllable QTL 3@668 and 11@104.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Unravelling domestication: introduction to the theme issue.
    Gillis RE, Dal Corso M, Oliveira HR, Spengler RN. Gillis RE, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 May;380(1926):20240187. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0187. Epub 2025 May 15. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40370018 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Collias NE. 1987. The vocal repertoire of the red junglefowl: a spectrographic classification and the code of communication. Condor 89, 510–524. ( 10.2307/1368641) - DOI
    1. Leonard ML, Horn AG. 1995. Crowing in relation to status in roosters. Anim. Behav. 49, 1283–1290. ( 10.1006/anbe.1995.0160) - DOI
    1. Komiyama T, Ikeo K, Tateno Y, Gojobori T. 2004. Japanese domesticated chickens have been derived from Shamo traditional fighting cocks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 16–21. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.019) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mooney R. 2020. The neurobiology of innate and learned vocalizations in rodents and songbirds. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 64, 24–31. ( 10.1016/j.conb.2020.01.004) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tixier-Boichard M, Bed’hom B, Rognon X. 2011. Chicken domestication: from archeology to genomics. C. R. Biol. 334, 197–204. ( 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.012) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources