Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun 24;135(6):17006.
doi: 10.20452/pamw.17006. Epub 2025 May 12.

Direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in patients with single- or double-positive antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in patients with single- or double-positive antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Matteo Nicoletto et al. Pol Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a heterogeneous disease where the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) results in blood clot formation. Compared with patients with a triple‑positive antibody profile, the optimal anticoagulant strategy in individuals with a single- or double‑positive APS is still debated due to their different risks of recurrent thrombosis.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for treating single- or double‑positive APS.

Patients and methods: The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched until September 2024 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that included patients with APS positive to a single or double aPL test. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with a random‑effects model.

Results: Three RCTs and 7 observational studies were included in the efficacy analysis, totaling 439 patients treated with DOACs and 481 with VKAs. No difference in the risk of thrombosis recurrence was observed between the 2 treatments (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.36-1.69), despite an opposite trend in RCTs (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 0.61-10.59) as compared with the observational studies (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.25-1.39). Two RCTs and 6 observational studies reported data on bleeding, totaling 287 patients in the DOAC and 367 in the VKA group. No difference in the risk of major bleeding / clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding between treatments was detected (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.3-2.05).

Conclusions: DOACs could be an effective and safe alternative to VKAs for managing single- or double‑positive APS.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources