Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 30:7:1584415.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1584415. eCollection 2025.

Beyond the gender data gap: co-creating equitable digital patient twins

Affiliations
Review

Beyond the gender data gap: co-creating equitable digital patient twins

Nora Weinberger et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Digital patient twins constitute a transformative innovation in personalized medicine, integrating patient-specific data into predictive models that leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize diagnostics and treatments. However, existing digital patient twins often fail to incorporate gender-sensitive and socio-economic factors, reinforcing biases and diminishing their clinical effectiveness. This (gender) data gap, long recognized as a fundamental problem in digital health, translates into significant disparities in healthcare outcomes. This mini-review explores the interdisciplinary connections of technical foundations, medical relevance, as well as social and ethical challenges of digital patient twins, emphasizing the necessity of gender-sensitive design and co-creation approaches. We argue that without intersectional and inclusive frameworks, digital patient twins risk perpetuating existing inequalities rather than mitigating them. By addressing the interplay between gender, AI-driven decision-making and health equity, this mini-review highlights strategies for designing more inclusive and ethically responsible digital patient twins to further interdisciplinary approaches.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; co-creation; digital patient twins; ethical aspects; gender data gap; personalized medicine; social implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the development of gender-sensitive digital patient twins (DPTs). The figure shows a gender-balanced data collection of population-based data and individual patient-specific data which is used to develop the model. The consideration of diverse patient populations during the development and validation phase enables a precise and personalized outcome by the underlaying artificial intelligence algorithm of the DPT.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pesapane F, Rotili A, Penco S, Nicosia L, Cassano E. Digital twins in radiology. J Clin Med. (2022) 11(21):6553. 10.3390/jcm11216553 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischer RP, Volpert A, Antonino P, Ahrens TD. Digital patient twins for personalized therapeutics and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Front Digit Health. (2024) 5:1302338. 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1302338 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viceconti M, De Vos M, Mellone S, Geris L. Position paper from the digital twins in healthcare to the virtual human twin: a moon-shot project for digital health research. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. (2023) 28(1):491–501. 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3323688 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shamanna P, Erukulapati RS, Shukla A, Shah L, Willis B, Thajudeen M, et al. One-year outcomes of a digital twin intervention for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective real-world study. Sci Rep. (2024) 14(1):25478. 10.1038/s41598-024-76584-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Maeyer C, Markopoulos P. Future outlook on the materialisation, expectations and implementation of digital twins in healthcare. BCS Learning & Development (2021). p. 180–91. 10.14236/ewic/HCI2021.18 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources