Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 14;17(4):e82224.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.82224. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Smart Fluids As Autophagy-Activating Photoprotectors: In Vitro Analysis of Dead Sea Water and Magnetized Saline Water Against Ultraviolet B (UVB)-Induced Photodamage in Human Keratinocytes

Affiliations

Smart Fluids As Autophagy-Activating Photoprotectors: In Vitro Analysis of Dead Sea Water and Magnetized Saline Water Against Ultraviolet B (UVB)-Induced Photodamage in Human Keratinocytes

Eugenia V Di Brizzi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Autophagy induction has been shown to mitigate both ultraviolet B (UVB)-induced DNA damage and inflammation. Smart fluids, including Dead Sea water (DSW) and saline magnetized water (MW), have recently been suggested to promote autophagy activation. This in vitro study was designed to investigate the ability of DSW and saline MW to inhibit the formation of UVB-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and the expression of the NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in UVB-irradiated HaCaT cells, a well-established, spontaneously immortalized human keratinocyte cell line. Methods To explore whether autophagy mediated the photoprotection induced by smart fluids, we measured two established autophagy markers (beclin-1 and LC3B) in HaCaT cell lysates and examined how wortmannin, an autophagy inhibitor, modulated the smart fluids' effects on post-irradiation CPDs and NLRP3 inflammasome levels. Results Compared to unirradiated control cells not exposed to any fluid (set at 1 a.u.), pretreatment with DSW (15.7 ± 1.9 a.u.) and saline MW (11.3 ± 1.6 a.u.) markedly reduced CPD formation in UVB-irradiated cells compared to two control fluids (saline non-MW: 20.9 ± 0.8 a.u.; distilled water: 21.4 ± 0.6 a.u.) (all p < 0.001). Notably, among the two smart fluids, saline MW significantly outperformed DSW in terms of DNA protection (p < 0.001). Conversely, DSW and saline MW demonstrated no statistically significant difference in NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition (p = 0.56). Both smart fluids effectively attenuated the UVB-induced decrease in beclin-1 and LC3B (all p < 0.001), although the observed effects were significantly more pronounced for saline MW (both p < 0.05). Notably, wortmannin either partially (CPDs) or completely (NLRP3 inflammasome) abrogated the photoprotective effects of both DSW and saline MW, suggesting that the observed chemopreventive properties were mainly attributable to their action as autophagy activators. Conclusions Our findings support the potential application of DSW and saline MW as sustainable active ingredients in topical skin products aimed at preventing UVB-induced non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous inflammaging.

Keywords: autophagy; cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers; dead sea water; inflammation; keratinocytes; magnetized water; ultraviolet radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental protocol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The impact of ultraviolet radiation on skin photoaging - review of in vitro studies. Gromkowska-Kępka KJ, Puścion-Jakubik A, Markiewicz-Żukowska R, Socha K. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:3427–3431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Current insights and future perspectives of ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure: Friends and foes to the skin and beyond the skin. Tang X, Yang T, Yu D, Xiong H, Zhang S. Environ Int. 2024;185:108535. - PubMed
    1. From DNA repair to proteome protection: new molecular insights for preventing non-melanoma skin cancers and skin aging. Emanuele E, Spencer JM, Braun M. https://jddonline.com/articles/from-dna-repair-to-proteome-protection-ne.... J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:274–281. - PubMed
    1. Protective effect of trehalose-loaded liposomes against UVB-induced photodamage in human keratinocytes. Emanuele E, Bertona M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Pareja-Galeano H, Lucia A. Biomed Rep. 2014;2:755–759. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The surprising diversity of UV-induced mutations. Laughery MF, Wilson HE, Sewell A, Stevison S, Wyrick JJ. Adv Genet (Hoboken) 2024;5:2300205. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources