Evaluation of the JRI Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: Mid-Term Results Including Patient-Reported Outcomes
- PMID: 40370971
- PMCID: PMC12075964
- DOI: 10.1177/21514593251332462
Evaluation of the JRI Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: Mid-Term Results Including Patient-Reported Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Hemiarthroplasty is the primary treatment for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in frail patients. Implant selection is crucial to reduce reoperations, which carry a high complication risk. This study reports on reoperations, mortality, revisions, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following the use of the JRI (Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited) Furlong Cemented Hemiarthroplasty prosthesis.
Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study at a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom. All intracapsular neck of femur patients aged over 60 who underwent cemented hip hemiarthroplasty with the JRI Furlong femoral stem over a 5 year period from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. The primary outcome measure was reoperation, including closed reduction of dislocation. Secondary outcome measures were dislocation specifically, revision, mortality and PROMs.
Results: 1183 patients in the study period (793 female, 390 male) with an average age of 84.3 were followed up to 6 years. For a subset of patients, PROMs were recorded at 4 months (n = 237) and 3 years (n = 215). The reoperation rate at 1 year was 1.13% (95% CI 0.64% to 1.99%), increasing to 1.62% (95% CI 0.95% to 2.75%) at 5 years. The 5-year revision rate was 0.68% (95% CI 0.39% to 1.55%); 5-year dislocation rate was 0.87% (95% CI 0.45% to 1.67%). Mean EQ5D utility score was 0.621 at 4 months and 0.603 at 3 years for those alive.
Conclusions: Our cohort shows low re-operation, revision and dislocation rates in the mid-term. We describe acceptable PROMS in the context of a frail population.
Keywords: PROM; hemiarthroplasty; hip; medium; mid; outcome; patient-reported; re-operation; revision.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Mr Michael Kelly has consultancies with Stryker and J&J MedTech. None are relevant to this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jan;478(1):90-100. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000826. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 31855192 Free PMC article.
-
Cemented hemiarthroplasty or hip replacement for intracapsular neck of femur fracture? A comparison of 7732 matched patients using national data.Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1940-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 22. Injury. 2013. PMID: 23618782 Review.
-
Early complications following cemented modular hip hemiarthroplasty.Open Orthop J. 2015 Jan 31;9:15-9. doi: 10.2174/1874325001509010015. eCollection 2015. Open Orthop J. 2015. PMID: 25685248 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Uncemented vs Cemented Hemiarthroplasty and Revision Surgery Among Patients With Hip Fracture.JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1077-1084. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1067. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32181848 Free PMC article.
-
The Cemented Unipolar Prosthesis for the Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Dependent Osteopenic Elderly.J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.029. Epub 2015 Dec 2. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 26742902 Review.
References
-
- Lawrence TM, White CT, Wenn R, Moran CG. The current hospital costs of treating hip fractures. Injury. 2005;36(1):88-91. - PubMed
-
- Boast - the care of the older or frail orthopaedic patient. https://www.boa.ac.uk/resource/boast-frailty.html (Accessed: 24 October 2024).
-
- Hernandez NM, Fruth KM, Larson DR, et al. Conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty remains high risk for subsequent complications. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(9):2030-2036. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources