Regulatory challenges of digital health: the case of mental health applications and personal data in South Africa
- PMID: 40371347
- PMCID: PMC12074941
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1498600
Regulatory challenges of digital health: the case of mental health applications and personal data in South Africa
Abstract
Introduction: This study explores the regulatory challenges posed by digital mental health applications in South Africa, particularly regarding the collection and protection of personal data. It aimed to assess whether South Africa's current legal framework sufficiently protects users' sensitive mental health data amidst the rise of digital mental health solutions, especially in the context of privacy concerns.
Methods: The research focused on the intersection of digital mental health applications, data protection laws, and user privacy in South Africa. It examined existing legal frameworks, including the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA), National Health Act (NHA), and Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The study reviewed relevant literature, legal texts, and case studies, focusing on mental health applications in both urban and rural contexts.
Results: While South Africa has laws in place to protect personal information, these laws have significant gaps in addressing the unique risks associated with digital mental health technologies. Key findings include inadequate regulation of AI-driven mental health tools, insufficient guidelines for third-party data sharing, and challenges with cross-border data transfers.
Discussion: The implications of these findings suggest that South Africa needs to modernize its legal framework to better regulate digital mental health tools and ensure user privacy. This includes improving AI regulation, strengthening consent mechanisms, and enhancing protections against third-party data misuse. Future research should focus on developing specific legal guidelines for mental health data and addressing the vulnerabilities faced by rural populations with low digital literacy. The study's conclusions align with global concerns over the ethical implications of mental health datacommodification and emphasize the need for robust, adaptable regulatory approaches.
Keywords: AI-driven mental health tools; South African legal framework; data protection; digital mental health; mental health data security; privacy regulation.
Copyright © 2025 Botes.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Data privacy in healthcare: Global challenges and solutions.Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;11:20552076251343959. doi: 10.1177/20552076251343959. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40475296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34319252 Free PMC article.
-
Context-Contingent Privacy Concerns and Exploration of the Privacy Paradox in the Age of AI, Augmented Reality, Big Data, and the Internet of Things: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 14;27:e71951. doi: 10.2196/71951. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40367513 Free PMC article.
-
Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013.S Afr Med J. 2019 Jun 28;109(7):468-470. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i7.14148. S Afr Med J. 2019. PMID: 31266570
-
Data protection, data management, and data sharing: Stakeholder perspectives on the protection of personal health information in South Africa.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0260341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260341. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34928950 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baig M. Z., Kavakli M. (2019). A survey on psycho-physiological analysis and measurement methods in multimodal systems. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 3 (2), 37. 10.3390/mti3020037 - DOI
-
- Cassim S., Chapanduka Z. C. (2024). Cyberattack on the national health laboratory service of South Africa – implications, response and recommendations. S Afr. Med. J. 114 (12), e2549. 10.7196/samj.2024.v114i12.2549 - DOI
-
- Farahany N. A. (2023). The battle for your brain: defending the right to think freely in the age of neurotechnology. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources