Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 9:17:1321-1332.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S512216. eCollection 2025.

A Dual-Sequence MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Efficacy in Adenomyosis Treatment

Affiliations

A Dual-Sequence MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Efficacy in Adenomyosis Treatment

Mengmeng Sun et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for the therapeutic efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in the treatment of adenomyosis, utilizing dual-sequence MRI radiomics.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 114 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis who underwent ultrasound-guided HIFU ablation under conscious sedation between July 2021 and July 2023. Patients were randomly allocated into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 7:3. The study aimed to evaluate the distribution of clinical characteristics among patients experiencing effective versus ineffective ablation at two distinct classification thresholds (0.7 and 0.5). Multiple models were developed to explore the combination of effective radiomic features derived from dual-sequence MRI and clinical data. Radiomic features were extracted from the MRI images of adenomyosis lesions in the training set. This process included feature extraction, selection, model construction, and evaluation. Logistic regression was used to construct the predictive model, and its performance was assessed on the test set using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Delong test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare the predictive accuracy of the models.

Results: The predictive model showed better alignment with actual ablation outcomes, particularly for predicting ablation success rates exceeding 50%. The combination of radiomic features from the two MRI sequences achieved an AUC of 0.84 in the test set. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the combined model provided greater net benefit than the single-sequence radiomics model across a broader range of risk thresholds. For the prediction of 70% efficacy, the combined model achieved an AUC of 0.804 in the test set, slightly lower the 50% efficacy prediction task.

Conclusion: The model, based on dual-sequence MRI radiomics, emerges as a promising tool for predicting the efficacy of HIFU ablation, potentially aiding clinicians in anticipating the outcomes of HIFU ablation procedures.

Keywords: ablation; adenomyosis; high-intensity focused ultrasound; magnetic resonance imaging; radiomics analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors affirm that there were no financial or commercial ties that might be viewed as having a potential conflict of interest for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart of the enrolled patients with exclusion criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flowchart of Radiomics analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves for the task of predicting ablation rates greater than 50% and 70%. (A, C) training cohort, (B, D) testing cohort.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Decision curves for the task of predicting ablation rates greater than 50%. (A and B) training cohort, (C and D) testing cohort.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dason ES, Maxim M, Sanders A, et al.. Guideline No. 437: diagnosis and management of adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2023;45(6):417–29.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2023.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bulun SE, Yildiz S, Adli M, et al.. Adenomyosis pathogenesis: insights from next-generation sequencing. Human Reproduction Update. 2021;27(6):1086–1097. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmab017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Movilla P, Morris S, Isaacson K. A systematic review of tissue sampling techniques for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2020;27(2):344–351. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M. Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2020;27(2):408–18.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Munro MG. Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis. Journal Min Inv Gynecol. 2020;27(2):296–308. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources