Renal and ureteral temperatures changes during ureteroscopic pulsed thulium: YAG laser lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis
- PMID: 40371424
- PMCID: PMC12073521
- DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2024.0177
Renal and ureteral temperatures changes during ureteroscopic pulsed thulium: YAG laser lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Promising studies have shown a high stone-free rate achieved with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser. However, studies on its safety concerning temperature effects during activation remain limited. The aim of this study was to characterize temperature variations during laser activation.
Material and methods: This in vitro experimental study utilized a high-fidelity uretero-renal simulation model to assess temperature changes during intracorporeal laser lithotripsy. Temperatures reached after laser activation at 15, 20, and 30 seconds were recorded. The flow rates used were 10 ml/min and 20 ml/min. The maximum allowed temperature was set at 43°C, given its association with thermal tissue damage. A linear logistic regression model was used to analyze variations and project temperature behavior over time.
Results: In the renal model, temperature increases were correlated with the applied energy. With a 10 ml/min flow rate, no laser configuration exceeded 43°C at 15 seconds; at 20 seconds, only the 30 W (2.5 J/20 Hz) configuration exceeded this temperature. By 30 seconds, all 30 W configurations exceeded 43°C, except for 0.4 J/75 Hz. With a 20 ml/min flow rate, no laser configuration exceeded 43°C. The 20 ml/min flow rate decreased renal temperature by 1.96°C (p = 0.01). In the ureteral model, the temperature increase was not proportional to the applied energy, but in no scenario the temperatures reach the 43°C.
Conclusions: The temperature variations observed in this study with the use of the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser should be considered to avoid potential renal and ureteral thermal damage.
Keywords: bladder cancer; emergency department; radical cystectomy; readmission.
Copyright by Polish Urological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
The Rise and Fall of High Temperatures During Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):794-799. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0084. Epub 2019 May 27. J Endourol. 2019. PMID: 31016991
-
Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3951-3956. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03619-3. Epub 2021 Feb 19. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33604733
-
Does the Novel Thulium Fiber Laser Have a Higher Risk of Urothelial Thermal Injury than the Conventional Holmium Laser in an In Vitro Study?J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1249-1254. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0842. Epub 2022 Aug 2. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35302382
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2024 Jun;85(6):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 29. Eur Urol. 2024. PMID: 38290963
-
Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review.World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3437-3447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04679-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37932561 Review.
References
-
- Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: asystematic review. J Endourol. 2017; 31: 547-556. - PubMed
-
- Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE. Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg. Med. 1992; 12: 353-363. - PubMed
-
- Traxer O, Pearle M. Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: Which Is the Winner? Eur Urol. 2024; 85: 541-542. - PubMed
-
- Belle JD, Chen R, Srikureja N, Amasyali AS, Keheila M, Baldwin DD. Does the Novel Thulium Fiber Laser Have a Higher Risk of Urothelial Thermal Injury than the Conventional Holmium Laser in an In Vitro Study? J Endourol. 2022; 36: 1249-1254. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources