Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jul;17(7):2057-2067.
doi: 10.1111/os.70079. Epub 2025 May 15.

FPG Score: A Rapid Admission-Based Tool for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

FPG Score: A Rapid Admission-Based Tool for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Hip Fracture Patients

Marcello Covino et al. Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Hip fractures in elderly patients are a major public health concern, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early identification of high-risk patients is crucial to guide clinical decision-making, optimize resource allocation, and improve outcomes. However, existing risk prediction models, such as the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), require laboratory or postoperative data, delaying risk stratification. This study aims to develop and validate the FPG score, a novel and simplified tool for predicting intrahospital mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fractures, using only admission data available at triage.

Materials and methods: This single-center, observational cohort study was conducted in two phases: a retrospective derivation phase (2015-2019) and a prospective validation phase (2020-2022). Patients aged ≥ 65 years with proximal femur fractures (AO 31A, 31B) undergoing surgical treatment were included. Exclusions involved pathological, periprosthetic, and femoral head fractures (31C). Data on demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, and laboratory values were collected at Emergency Unit triage. The primary outcome was intrahospital mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors, and ROC analysis assessed the FPG score's predictive performance, with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity evaluated using SPSS v25 and MedCalc v18.

Results: In the retrospective phase, 1984 patients (median age: 83.5 years, 28.7% male) were analyzed, with an observed intrahospital mortality of 3.8% (77 patients). The FPG score demonstrated an AUC of 0.79, outperforming NHFS and CCI. A score > 2 was associated with a > 50% mortality risk, with 61% sensitivity and 80% specificity. In the validation cohort (752 patients, 4.8% mortality), the FPG score maintained strong predictive performance (AUC = 0.751).

Conclusion: The FPG score provides a rapid, objective, and clinically applicable tool for mortality risk assessment in elderly patients with hip fractures, allowing for immediate triage-based decision-making. Unlike NHFS and CCI, it does not require laboratory or post-admission data, making it particularly useful in emergency settings. Its integration into clinical practice may enhance patient management, improve resource allocation, and facilitate early intervention. While the score has been validated in a single-center study, further multicenter validation is needed to confirm its broader applicability. Future research should explore the integration of frailty indices and laboratory markers to refine its predictive accuracy.

Keywords: death; hip fracture; risk score; surgery; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
ROC curve comparison.

Similar articles

References

    1. Covino M., Vitiello R., De Matteis G., et al., “Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly With Non‐End‐Stage Chronic Kidney Disease: A Fall Related Analysis,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences 363, no. 1 (2022): 48–54, 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basilico M., Vitiello R., Oliva M. S., et al., “Predictable Risk Factors for Infections in Proximal Femur Fractures,” Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents 34, no. 3 Suppl. 2 (2020): 77–81. - PubMed
    1. Dhanwal D. K., Dennison E. M., Harvey N. C., and Cooper C., “Epidemiology of Hip Fracture: Worldwide Geographic Variation,” Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 45, no. 1 (2011): 15–22, 10.4103/0019-5413.73656. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gullberg B., Johnell O., and Kanis J. A., “World‐Wide Projections for Hip Fracture,” Osteoporosis International 7, no. 5 (1997): 407–413, 10.1007/pl00004148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magaziner J., Chiles N., and Orwig D., “Recovery After Hip Fracture: Interventions and Their Timing to Address Deficits and Desired Outcomes—Evidence From the Baltimore Hip Studies,” Nestle Nutrition Institute Workshop Series 83 (2015): 71–81, 10.1159/000382064. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types