Responsiveness of trunk asymmetry measurements in clinical photographs after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
- PMID: 40372456
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08918-6
Responsiveness of trunk asymmetry measurements in clinical photographs after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between changes in body image perception and trunk asymmetry measured in clinical photographs after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgical treatment.
Materials and methods: This is a prospective study of patients operated on for AIS with Lenke curves 1 and 2. Preoperatively and one year after surgery, patients underwent full-spine X-rays and digital photographs. They also completed the SRS-22R and Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS) questionnaires. On X-rays, the coronal Cobb angle was measured. In back torso photographs, the shoulder (SHA), axillary (AHA), and waist (WHA) height angles, waist fold angle (WA-r and WA-I), and the right/left ratio of hemitrunks (ArT) were measured. The pre- and post-surgery mean differences for all variables were calculated. The correlation between the improvement in the photographic variables and the questionnaire scores was also analyzed.
Results: 52 patients (82.7% female; mean age 15.6 years, mean preoperative Cobb 65.8°) were included. Significant differences were found between pre and postoperative mean scores in all variables. No correlation was found between the change in trunk asymmetry photographic parameters and the change in SRS-22/ TAPS imaging scale scores.
Conclusions: Surgery for idiopathic scoliosis significantly improves radiological deformity, trunk asymmetry, perception of trunk deformity, and body image. Photographic measures show significant responsiveness after surgery. The effect size of the change in photographic parameters was similar to that observed in the SRS-22 questionnaire and less than the radiological. However, no relationship was found between the changes observed in patient reported, radiological and photographic measures.
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Clinical photography; Image perception; Trunk asymmetry.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Therapeutic exercises for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 28;2(2):CD007837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38415871 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in trunk appearance perception and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing orthotic treatment: An observational study.PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325383. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40560896 Free PMC article.
-
Asymmetry in the Onset of Paraspinal Muscles Activity Differs in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis Compared With Those With a Symmetrical Spine.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1112-1121. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003364. Epub 2025 Jan 7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39774429
-
Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 18;2015(6):CD006850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006850.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26086959 Free PMC article.
-
The Risks and Benefits of Definitive Surgery in the Graduation of Idiopathic Early-Onset Scoliosis (I-EOS) Patients Whose Deformities Were Managed With Growing Rods: A Comparison With Matched Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients.J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Aug 1;45(7):364-369. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002966. Epub 2025 Mar 28. J Pediatr Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40152463
References
-
- Bridwell KH, Shufflebarger HL, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Betz RR, Bassett GS (2000) Parents’ and patients’ preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(18):2392–2399. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200009150-00020 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, Webb JK (2002) Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(14):1543–1550. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200207150-00012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss HR (2006) Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus Paper Scoliosis 1:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-1-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lonner BS, Ren Y, Yaszay B (2018) Evolution of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over 20 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(6):402–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002332 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Babaee T, Moradi V, Shariat A et al (2022) Disease-Specific outcome measures evaluating the Health-Related quality of life of children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and Scheuermann’s kyphosis: A literature review. Spine Surg Relat Res 6(3):2021–0237. https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2021-0237 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical