Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jul 1;11(7):726-734.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1059.

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Stereotactic Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Stereotactic Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

John Nikitas et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative radiotherapy remains underused for men with biochemical recurrence or adverse pathological features after radical prostatectomy (RP). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve utilization and poses potential radiobiological advantages.

Objective: To evaluate physician-reported late toxic effects and 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following post-RP SBRT.

Design, setting, and participants: This phase 2, single-arm trial was conducted in 2 academic centers in the US and included a comparator cohort. Men with post-RP prostate-specific antigen greater than 0.03 ng/mL or adverse pathologic features were included. Data were collected from February 2018 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from January to October 2024.

Interventions: SBRT delivered at 30 to 34 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate bed. Nodal irradiation, boost to gross disease, and/or hormonal therapy were delivered per physician discretion.

Main outcomes and measures: Late toxic effects (more than 90 days after treatment) were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. PROs were measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26. The proportion of men whose PROs had decrements greater than twice the threshold for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at any point during the first 2 years were evaluated. The longitudinal PROs for men receiving SBRT was compared with a cohort of 200 men receiving postoperative conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using logistic regression, while adjusting for baseline scores, age, and receipt of nodal irradiation.

Results: Of 100 patients treated with post-RP SBRT, the median (IQR) age was 68.5 (63.9-71.4) years, and the median (IQR) follow-up was 43 (37-53) months. Cumulative incidence of late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxic effects was 25% and 4%, respectively, and of late grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal tract toxic effects was 3% and 3%, respectively. The proportion of patients with decrements more than 2-fold the MCID in PROs was 38.9% (37 of 95) for urinary incontinence, 17.9% (17 of 95) for urinary irritation, and 34.1% (31 of 91) for bowel function. Compared with the CFRT cohort, the adjusted odds ratio for patients receiving SBRT experiencing decrements more than 2-fold the MCID was 1.55 (95% CI, 0.87-2.76; P = .14) for urinary incontinence, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.46-1.94; P = .87) for urinary irritation, and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.57-1.84; P = .93) for bowel function.

Conclusions and relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, post-RP SBRT was well-tolerated, with no measurably different decline in urinary or bowel PROs through 2 years compared with CFRT. Randomized studies and longer follow-up will better define the toxic effects and efficacy profile of post-RP SBRT.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03541850.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Rettig reported grants from Novartis, Merck, Inmune Bio, and Progenics as well as personal fees from Novartis, Inmune Bio, Aveo, Bayer, and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work; and had a patent for inhibitors of the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor issued. Dr Nickols reported grants from Lantheus and Janssen outside the submitted work. Dr Cao reported grants from Varian and personal fees from Varian and ViewRay Inc outside the submitted work. Dr Kishan reported grants from ViewRay Inc during the conduct of the study; grants from Janssen, Novartis, Lantheus, Artera, Point Biopharma, Boston Scientific, and Varian outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment on

References

    1. Parker CC, Clarke NW, Cook AD, et al. Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1413-1421. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31553-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1341-1352. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30454-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1331-1340. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30456-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. ; ARTISTIC Meta-analysis Group . Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1422-1431. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31952-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer, version 4.2024. Accessed November 16, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf

Associated data