Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;104(8):105217.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105217. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

Characterization of airborne bacterial diversity in conventional hen houses, enriched colonies and aviaries, and link between possible bioaerosol sources

Affiliations

Characterization of airborne bacterial diversity in conventional hen houses, enriched colonies and aviaries, and link between possible bioaerosol sources

M-W St-Germain et al. Poult Sci. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Canada's transition toward alternative housing systems for laying hens may have an impact on bioaerosol content and concentrations in those environments. This project aimed to characterize the airborne bacterial diversity in six conventional hen houses, six enriched colonies and six aviaries. The bacterial diversity found in bioaerosols was also compared to the diversity found in feces or litter samples from each corresponding housing type to investigate similarities between possible bioaerosol sources and bioaerosols.

Results: Specific richness (Sobs) and CHAO1 indexes were higher in air samples from conventional hen houses and enriched colonies, compared to their corresponding fecal or litter samples, which was not the case for aviaries samples. No significant differences were found between the Shannon and inverse Simpson (InvSimpson) indexes of air samples, compared to their corresponding fecal or litter samples. Firmicutes were the dominant phyla in all samples, followed by Actinobacteria. Dominant genera were Lactobacillus, unclassified Lanchnospiraceae, unclassified Actinomycetales, unclassified Clostridales and unclassified Ruminococcaceae. OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) were associated with hen microbiota and gut microbiota, and soil. Homogeneity of molecular variance analyses (HOMOVA) revealed significant differences between air samples from aviaries, compared to air samples from conventional and enriched cage houses. Significant differences were found between air and fecal or litter samples from conventional hen houses and enriched colonies, but not among aviary samples.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the effects of housing types on airborne bacterial diversity, and similarities in bacterial diversity between air and fecal or litter samples from three types of husbandry. Most dominant OTUs were shared across all samples, but were different in proportions, which may account for the differences in alpha and beta diversities. The overlap in bacterial diversities between air and litter samples collected in aviaries brings out the contribution of litter to ambient bioaerosols.

Keywords: 16 s rRNA gene; alternative hen houses; bacterial diversity; bioaerosols; feces; laying hens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rarefaction curves of air and droppings/litter samples from conventional hen house (CH), enriched colonies (EC) and aviaries (AV), mean ± SD.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alpha diversity indexes of air, fecal and litter samples from conventional hen houses, enriched colonies and aviaries. (mean, max-min) (* = p < 0.05, no mark = non-significant, Mann-Whitney).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative abundance of the 15 most abundant phyla (top) and the 20 most abundant genera (bottom) in air and fecal/litter samples from conventional housing systems (CH), enriched colonies (EC) and aviaries (AV).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of air and fecal/litter samples from conventional hen houses (CH), enriched colonies (EC) and aviaries (AV), from Bray-Curtis indices of top 50 OTUs.

Similar articles

References

    1. Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O. Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 1991;47:109–128. doi: 10.1079/WPS19910013. - DOI
    1. Arteaga V., Mitchell D., Armitage T., Tancredi D., Schenker M., Mitloehner F. Cage versus noncage laying-hen housings: respiratory exposures. J. Agromedicine. 2015;20:245–255. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1044681. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bari M.S., Kheravii S..K., Bajagai Y.S., Wu S.-B., Keerqin C., Campbell D.L.M. Cecal microbiota of free-range hens varied with different rearing enrichments and ranging patterns. Front. Microbiol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.797396. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergeron K., Rossi F., Létourneau V., Larios A.D., Godbout S., Fournel S., Duchaine C. Bioaerosols in eastern canadian dairy barns using tie- and free-stall housing. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2024;40:111–122. doi: 10.13031/aea.15720. - DOI
    1. Bindari Y.R., Moore R..J., Van T.T.H., Walkden-Brown S.W., Gerber P.F. Microbial taxa in dust and excreta associated with the productive performance of commercial meat chicken flocks. Anim. Microbiome. 2021;3:66. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00127-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed