Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;51(8):110138.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110138. Epub 2025 May 9.

The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin (CRM) definition and location in esophageal cancer: A 12-year cohort study

Ahmed M Elshaer  1 , Sian Jones  2 , Andrew J Cockbain  2 , Simon P L Dexter  2 , Heike I Grabsch  3 , Samir P Mehta  2 , Abeezar Sarela  2 , Nicholas P West  4 , Jeremy D Hayden  2
Affiliations

The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin (CRM) definition and location in esophageal cancer: A 12-year cohort study

Ahmed M Elshaer et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The definition of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement for esophageal cancer varies between the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) and College of American Pathologists (CAP). There are insufficient data regarding the prognostic relevance of different sites of involvement at the CRM. In this study, we examined the prognostic impacts of different CRM definitions and different radial margin locations.

Methods: This retrospective study included 449 patients who were treated by curative esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancers between 2010 and 2021. The distance of the closest tumour cells to the inked CRM was examined and site of CRM involvement was recorded. Patients with an involved longitudinal resection margin were excluded. Long-term follow up data were obtained from the hospital's electronic health records.

Results: Tumour cells at or within 1 mm from the CRM (CRM-RCP R1≤1 mm) was observed in 196 patients (43.7 %). CRM(≤1 mm) was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to CRM-R0, p-values <0.001 for both. Tumour cells at the CRM (CRM-CAP R1-0 mm) was observed in 61 patients (13.6 %). Patients with CRM-0mm had poorer OS and DFS compared to CRM≤1 mm, p-values 0.039 and 0.013 respectively. Presence of tumour cells (CRM≤1 mm) at multiple locations of the CRM was related to poorer survival compared to a single location; (OS p-value 0.008, DFS p-value 0.05). The posterior margin was the most common positive single CRM-positive site (44 %), followed by anterior (39 %) and lateral sites (17 %). However, the anterior margins carried poorer OS and DFS compared to posterior and lateral sites, (p-values 0.37 and 0.39 respectively).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that CRM involvement as defined by RCP was an independent prognostic factor for both survival and recurrence in esophageal cancer. It promoted the value of additional reporting CRM-0mm in CRM-R1 cases. The study also investigated the relative importance of reporting CRM-R1 location, which might be a useful prognostic tool in the future.

Keywords: CAP definition; Circumferential resection margin (CRM); Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; R0-resection; R1-resection; RCP definition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest All authors (Ahmed M Elshaer, Sian Jones, Andrew J Cockbain, Simon PL Dexter, Heike I Grabsch, Samir P Mehta, Abeezar Sarela, Nicholas P West, Jeremy D Hayden) have no conflict of interests to declare. The results were presented as an oral presentation at the European Society of Surgical Oncology congress in 2022 and as an oral poster at the 20th International Society for Diseases of Esophagus congress in 2024.

LinkOut - more resources