Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;27(3):353-364.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-02019-y. Epub 2025 May 15.

Radiogenomic Profiling for Survival Analysis in Gastric Cancer: Integrating CT Imaging, Gene Expression, and Clinical Data

Affiliations

Radiogenomic Profiling for Survival Analysis in Gastric Cancer: Integrating CT Imaging, Gene Expression, and Clinical Data

Anju R Nath et al. Mol Imaging Biol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to integrate CT (Computed Tomography) radiomic features, gene expression profiles, and clinical data to identify radiogenomic biomarkers and improve overall survival prediction in gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Procedures: Quantitative radiomic analysis was performed on 37 GC CT images, alongside gene expression and clinical data, to identify biomarkers associated with overall survival. Tumor segmentation and radiomic feature extraction were followed by Pearson correlation for feature selection. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) identified pathways linking gene expression changes with radiomic features. Regression models were applied to explore the relationships between these pathways, radiomic features, and clinical data in survival prediction.

Results: A total of 107 radiomic features were extracted, with 46 radiomic features, 1,032 genes, and one clinical feature (age) selected for further analysis. GSEA identified 29 significant KEGG pathways, mainly involving immune, signal transduction, and catabolism pathways. In survival analysis, the SVM model performed best, identifying age, genes CSF1R and CXCL12, and image features ShortRunHighGrayLevelEmphasis and Idn (Inverse Difference Normalized) as independent predictors.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of integrating imaging, genomics, and clinical data for prognosis in GC patients, with identified genes suggesting new radiogenomic biomarker candidates for future evaluation.

Keywords: CT imaging; GSEA; Gastric cancer; Radiogenomics; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424
    1. Serra O, Galán M, Ginesta MM, Calvo M, Sala N, Salazar R (2019) Comparison and applicability of molecular classifications for gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 77:29–34 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma: an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64(1):31–49 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Kwon SJ (2011) Evaluation of the 7th UICC TNM staging system of gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 11(2):78–85 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Tschmelitsch J, Weiser MR, Karpeh MS (2000) Modern staging in gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 9(1):23–30 - PubMed - DOI

Substances