Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug;27(8):4300-4310.
doi: 10.1111/dom.16467. Epub 2025 May 15.

Cruciferous vegetables improve glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in a randomized, controlled, crossover trial: The VEgetableS for vaScular hEaLth (VESSEL) study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cruciferous vegetables improve glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in a randomized, controlled, crossover trial: The VEgetableS for vaScular hEaLth (VESSEL) study

Emma L Connolly et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: Higher cruciferous vegetable (e.g., broccoli) intake is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but limited causal evidence exists. We investigated if cruciferous vegetable intake improved glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in non-diabetic adults with elevated blood pressure.

Materials and methods: This randomized, controlled, crossover trial consisted of two 2-week dietary interventions (300 g/day cruciferous [active] and root/squash [control] soups with standardized lunch/dinner meals) separated by a 2-week washout. Participants were blinded to the intervention allocation. Glycaemic measures were a pre-specified secondary outcome. Flash glucose monitoring measured interstitial glucose every 15-min throughout both interventions. Mealtimes and consumption were recorded in food diaries. Differences in continuous glucose, glycaemic variability (coefficient of variation [CV]), and overall, lunch, and dinner postprandial glucose response (PPGR; 2-h mean glucose [PPGR 2-h] and area under the curve [AUC]) were assessed using linear mixed-effects regression.

Results: Eighteen participants (female = 89%) completed the study (median [IQR] age: 68 [66-70 years]). Glycaemic variability was lower in the active versus control (mean difference: -2.0%, 95% CI -2.8, -1.1, p < 0.001). Overall PPGR 2-h and AUC were lower in the active versus control (mean difference: -0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.24, -0.04, p = 0.005 and -20.1 mmol/L × min, 95% CI -34.1, -6.1, p = 0.005, respectively), driven by the dinner PPGR (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). There was no difference in mean continuous glucose for active versus control (p = 0.411).

Conclusions: Cruciferous vegetable consumption improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with root/squash vegetables. The clinical impact remains uncertain and warrants further investigation, particularly in individuals with impaired glycaemic control.

Clinical trial registry: This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12619001294145).

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; cruciferous vegetables; diabetes; glucosinolates; glycaemic control; postprandial glucose response; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design overview.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Hourly mean continuous glucose (mmol/L) for both the active and control 2‐week intervention periods.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Mean ± standard deviation glucose (mmol/L) at each time point (0–120 min) after (A) lunch, (B) dinner and (C) overall, for both active (green squares) and control (orange circles) interventions. *p < 0.05.

References

    1. International Diabetes Foundation . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. International Diabetes Foundation; 2021.
    1. Abdul‐Ghani MA, DeFronzo RA. Plasma glucose concentration and prediction of future risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(suppl 2):S194‐S198. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Ninomiya T, et al. Association of HbA1c levels with vascular complications and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of glycaemic thresholds. Diabetologia. 2012;55(3):636‐643. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2404-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abushanab D, Marquina C, Morton JI, et al. Projecting the health and economic burden of cardiovascular disease among people with type 2 diabetes, 2022–2031. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023;41(6):719‐732. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01258-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halvorsen RE, Elvestad M, Molin M, Aune D. Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021;4(2):519‐531. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000218 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types