Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May;35(5):e70069.
doi: 10.1111/sms.70069.

Effects of Blood-Flow Restricted Resistance Exercise Versus Neuromuscular Exercise on Mechanical Muscle Function in Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis-A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Blood-Flow Restricted Resistance Exercise Versus Neuromuscular Exercise on Mechanical Muscle Function in Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis-A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Brian Sørensen et al. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025 May.

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (knee OA) is a prevalent condition worldwide. Globally recognized rehabilitation guidelines for knee OA include patient education and neuromuscular exercises (NEMEX). While heavy-load resistance exercise (70%-90% 1RM) often induces pain with knee OA, low-load exercise (20%-40% 1RM) combined with partial blood-flow restriction (BFR-RE) has been introduced without inducing excessive knee joint pain. The present study aimed to compare the effects of NEMEX and BFR-RE on mechanical muscle function in knee OA individuals. Ninety-six participants (age 56.7 ± 7.6; 47 males, 49 females) with symptomatic, radiographic knee OA were randomized to free-flow land-based NEMEX or unilateral machine-based BFR-RE. Both groups exercised biweekly for 12 weeks while also receiving patient education. Outcomes measured from baseline to 12 weeks included maximal isometric knee extensor strength (MVIC), rate of force development (RFD), maximal leg extensor power (LEP), and cross-sectional area (mCSA) of rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL). Significant (p < 0.01) within-group improvements from baseline to 12 weeks were observed in both groups for MVIC (BFR-RE: +0.4 vs. NEMEX: +0.1 Nm/kg), LEP (+0.6 vs. +0.2 W/kg), mCSA for RF (+1.8 vs. +0.6 cm2), and VL (+3.7 vs. +1.0 cm2). BFR-RE led to increases in RFD (+2.11 (50-ms), +4.48 (200-ms) Nm/s/kg) (p < 0.01), whereas NEMEX did not (p > 0.05). Between-group comparisons revealed greater improvements with BFR-RE for all outcomes (p < 0.01). BFR-RE appears superior to NEMEX in enhancing mechanical muscle function and knee extensor mCSA in knee OA individuals. The enhanced physiological responses observed with BFR-RE suggest that this exercise modality should be considered as an adjunct therapeutic tool in future treatment protocols for knee OA patients.

Keywords: blood‐flow restriction; exercise; knee; neuromuscular; osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Within‐ and between‐group changes in percentage related to mechanical muscle function. Group mean %‐changes from baseline to 8 weeks (PRE‐TO‐MID) and baseline to 12 weeks (PRE‐TO‐POST). *p < 0.05 for within‐group change. **p < 0.01 for within‐group change. # p < 0.01 for between‐group difference in delta change (Δ). (A) Nottingham LEP: Leg Extensor Power for the symptomatic knee OA leg, Nottingham Power‐Rig; (B) MVIC: Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction, KinCom; (C) RFD: Rate of Force Development at 50 ms, KinCom; (D) RFD: Rate of Force Development at 200 ms, KinCom; (E) RF mCSA: Rectus Femoris muscle Cross‐Sectional Area; (F) VL mCSA: Vastus Lateralis muscle Cross‐Sectional Area; BFR‐RE: Blood‐Flow Restricted Resistance Exercise group; NEMEX: NEuroMuscular EXercise group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Steinmetz J. D., Culbreth G. T., Haile L. M., et al., “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet Rheumatology 5, no. 9 (2023): e508–e522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abramson S. B. and Attur M., “Developments in the Scientific Understanding of Osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Research & Therapy 11, no. 3 (2009): 227. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skoffer B., Dalgas U., Mechlenburg I., Soballe K., and Maribo T., “Functional Performance Is Associated With Both Knee Extensor and Flexor Muscle Strength in Patients Scheduled for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross‐Sectional Study,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 47, no. 5 (2015): 454–459. - PubMed
    1. Accettura A. J., Brenneman E. C., Stratford P. W., and Maly M. R., “Knee Extensor Power Relates to Mobility Performance in People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Cross‐Sectional Analysis,” Physical Therapy 95, no. 7 (2015): 989–995. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gong Z., Li J., He Z., et al., “Quadriceps Strength Is Negatively Associated With Knee Joint Structural Abnormalities—Data From Osteoarthritis Initiative,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 23, no. 1 (2022): 784. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources