Treatment of patent foramen ovale
- PMID: 40375764
- PMCID: PMC12063554
- DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00915
Treatment of patent foramen ovale
Abstract
After extensive debate, the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been established as a first-line treatment for the secondary prevention of PFO-related stroke in patients between 18 and 60 years old, whereas the role of PFO closure for primary prevention remains controversial. Additionally, in selected cases, PFO closure may be considered beyond these age limits and for other indications such as the treatment of systemic deoxygenation syndromes and the secondary prevention of systemic embolism or decompression sickness, when the PFO has been determined to be causative in the condition. In all cases, an in-depth diagnostic work-up, requiring collaboration among different specialists, is necessary to estimate the likelihood of PFO being related to the clinical condition. Since the first percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect in 1976, the technique has been adapted and simplified for PFO. It is now well standardised with double-disc occluders, which are widely adopted because of their ease of use and evidence-based efficacy and safety. The procedure is generally straightforward, but some anatomical characteristics may be challenging. The choice of device and drug therapy after the procedure is currently empirical and guided by patient characteristics. Early and late complications of the procedure are infrequent but require early diagnosis. Further evidence is eagerly awaited to improve diagnosis, define other indications, make better procedural choices, and prescribe the most effective drug therapy after closure.
Conflict of interest statement
C. Pristipino reports an institutional research grant from Mendes SA outside of this submitted work, in his previous affiliation. J. Carroll reports consultant fees, lecture honoraria, and institutional research grants from Abbott; and consultant fees from Holistick Medical. J.-L. Mas reports lecture honoraria from Abbott. N.C. Wunderlich reports consultant fees from Holistick Medical; and lecture honoraria from Lifetech Scientific, Boston Scientific, W. L. Gore & Associates, Siemens, GE Healthcare, Philips, Abbott, and Edwards Lifesciences. L. Sondergaard reports previous consultant fees and/or institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and SMT; and, at present, being Chief Medical Officer and Divisional Vice President, Medical Affairs, at Abbott.
Similar articles
-
Amplatzer or Figulla Flex II Occluder: a comparative study of outcomes after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure.J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Apr;36(4). doi: 10.25270/jic/23.00291. J Invasive Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38412438
-
The Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Preventing Subsequent Neurological Events: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis to Identify the Best Device.Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(2):124-134. doi: 10.1159/000507317. Epub 2020 Apr 14. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020. PMID: 32289794
-
Device closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Oct 16. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24139929
-
Stroke prevention by percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart. 2014 Mar;100(5):389-95. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304394. Epub 2013 Jun 21. Heart. 2014. PMID: 23793373
-
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Pristipino C, Sievert H, D’Ascenzo F, Mas JL, Meier B, Scacciatella P, Hildick-Smith D, Gaita F, Toni D, Kyrle P, Thomson J, Derumeaux G, Onorato E, Sibbing D, Germonpré P, Berti S, Chessa M, Bedogni F, Dudek D, Hornung M, Zamorano J European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI); European Stroke Organisation (ESO); European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI); Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC); ESC Working group on GUCH; ESC Working group on Thrombosis; European Haematological Society (EHA) European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. EuroIntervention. 2019;14:1389–402. - PubMed
-
- Saric M, Armour AC, Arnaout MS, Chaudhry FA, Grimm RA, Kronzon I, Landeck BF, Maganti K, Michelena HI, Tolstrup K. Guidelines for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of a Cardiac Source of Embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29:1–42. - PubMed
-
- Forsberg F, Basude R, Liu JB, Alessandro J, Shi WT, Rawool NM, Goldberg BB, Wheatley MA. Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:1203–11. - PubMed
-
- Buttignoni SC, Khorsand A, Mundigler G, Bergler-Klein J, Heger M, Zehetgruber M, Baumgartner H, Binder T. Agitated saline versus polygelatine for the echocardiographic assessment of patent foramen ovale. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:1059–65. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical