Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 12:13:a25681366.
doi: 10.1055/a-2568-1366. eCollection 2025.

Impact of age and comorbidities on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes: Large multicenter study in a Western cohort

Affiliations

Impact of age and comorbidities on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes: Large multicenter study in a Western cohort

Sandro Sferrazza et al. Endosc Int Open. .

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as the standard treatment for colorectal lesions. Considering aging of the global population, we aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of colorectal ESD in patients aged ≥ 80 years compared with those aged 65 to 79 years in a large Western cohort.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients aged > 64 years undergoing colorectal ESD, classifying them into a very elderly group (VE-Group, aged > 80 years) and elderly group (E-Group, 65-79 years). Procedure outcomes and safety were compared between the VE-Group and E-Group and between patients with comorbidities and those who were healthy (1-CM-Group and H-Group).

Results: A total of 980 patients were included (269; 27.5% in the VE-Group and 711; 72.5% in the E-Group). En-bloc, R0, and oncological curative resection rates did not differ, nor did intra-procedure or post-procedure adverse events (AEs). Delirium occurrence was registered in VE-group [6 (2.2%) in VE-Group vs 1 (0.1%) in E-Group; P = 0.001; OR = 16.2, (95%CI:1.9-135.2)]. The 1-CM-Group had a higher rate of intra-procedure bleeding ( P = 0.001), delayed perforation ( P = 0.03), fever onset ( P < 0.001), and systemic infections ( P = 0.02) compared with the H-Group. Having one or more comorbidities was associated with increased overall AEs ( P < 0.001; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6).

Conclusions: Colorectal ESD is feasible in elderly patients. Physicians should consider delirium a possible AE in patients older than age 80 years. These findings, which bridge the gap between Asian and Western clinical data, underscore the importance of tailored pre-procedure and post-procedure assessments in a global clinical context.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...); Endoscopy Lower GI Tract; Epidemiology; Polyps / adenomas / ....

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Comparison of procedure-related AEs and overall AE occurrence in very elderly group vs. elderly group. b Comparison of procedure-related AEs and overall AE occurrence in 1-Comorbidity group vs. Healthy group.

References

    1. Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy. 2023;55:361–389. doi: 10.1055/a-2031-0874. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastrointestinal Lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022;54:591–622. doi: 10.1055/a-1811-7025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R et al. Colorectal Polypectomy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024;56:516–545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sninsky JA, Shore BM, Lupu GV et al. Risk factors for colorectal polyps and cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc Clin N Am. 2022;32:195–213. - PubMed
    1. Allescher HD, Weingart V. Optimizing screening colonoscopy: Strategies and alternatives. Visc Med. 2019;35:215–225. doi: 10.1159/000501835. - DOI - PMC - PubMed