Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):913-927.
doi: 10.21037/tau-2024-682. Epub 2025 Apr 27.

Sexual wellbeing support for men with prostate cancer: a qualitative study with patients

Megan Charlick  1 , Michael Murphy  2 , Barbara Murphy  2   3 , Kerry Ettridge  4   5 , Michael O'Callaghan  5   6   7 , Sally Sara  8 , Alexandar Jay  6 , Kerri Beckmann  1
Affiliations

Sexual wellbeing support for men with prostate cancer: a qualitative study with patients

Megan Charlick et al. Transl Androl Urol. .

Abstract

Background: Sexual concerns remain the most frequently reported unmet need among men with prostate cancer. We aimed to explore patient's experiences seeking and receiving sexual wellbeing support after prostate cancer treatment, to ultimately identify areas which should be prioritised for improvement, as informed by the patients themselves.

Methods: Prostate cancer patients between 18-36 months post-treatment participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted via video conference, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Interviews explored cancer experience, sexual support sought/received, and barriers to obtaining/receiving sexual wellbeing support.

Results: Most men relied on their treating clinician or specialist nurse for information about sexual wellbeing, though some consulted other professionals (physiotherapists, sexologists), peak bodies, the internet, or other men with prostate cancer. Information received was often fragmented, not specific to individuals' needs, or given at the wrong time or with limited follow-up. Barriers to help-seeking included the higher priority to be "cancer free", embarrassment, concerns about overburdening healthcare professionals, the perceived reluctance of clinicians to discuss sexual wellbeing and limited time for discussion. Continuity of care, accessibility of sexual-wellbeing experts, involvement of partners and personalised information were perceived as facilitating help-seeking for sexual health concerns.

Conclusions: To address the numerous shortcomings and barriers to seeking and receiving sexual wellbeing support, men with prostate cancer recommended that support should be provided both pre- and post-treatment, preferably by a healthcare professional trained to provide personalised and evidence-based sexual-wellbeing care. The sexual health needs of men with prostate cancer may be better met through ensuring men have continuing access to sexual wellbeing experts who can provide personalised support.

Keywords: Male; prostatic neoplasms; qualitative methods; sexual health; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tau.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tau-2024-682/coif). M.M. declares that he is the owner of the research company MMResearch, who was commissioned to conduct the interviews with participants. B.M. declares that she is employee of the research company MMResearch, who was commissioned to conduct interviews with participants. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of main themes relating to seeking and receiving sexual wellbeing information and support provided men with prostate cancer.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Pre-Implementation Assessment of a Sexual Health eClinic in Canadian Oncology Care.
    Incze T, Peres D, Guirguis S, Neil-Sztramko SE, Bender J, Elterman D, Alibhai SMH, Finelli A, Bach PV, Belita E, Brock G, Brown J, Campbell J, Domes T, Feifer A, Flannigan R, Higano C, Ory J, Patel P, Sundar M, Witherspoon L, Matthew A. Incze T, et al. Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 10;32(7):395. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070395. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40710205 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Cancer data in Australia 2024. AIHW, Canberra. 2024. Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia. Accessed 05/02/2025.
    1. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1415-24. 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith DP, King MT, Egger S, et al. Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b4817. 10.1136/bmj.b4817 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers SK, Chung E, Wittert G, et al. Erectile dysfunction, masculinity, and psychosocial outcomes: a review of the experiences of men after prostate cancer treatment. Transl Androl Urol 2017;6:60-8. 10.21037/tau.2016.08.12 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE. Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn. Urol Oncol 2009;27:137-43. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.032 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources