Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1:15:1531836.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1531836. eCollection 2025.

Prognostic correlation analysis of colorectal cancer patients based on monocyte to lymphocyte ratio and folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells and construction of a machine learning survival prediction models

Affiliations

Prognostic correlation analysis of colorectal cancer patients based on monocyte to lymphocyte ratio and folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells and construction of a machine learning survival prediction models

Siying Pan et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of the monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to develop predictive model for post-treatment survival using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 67 CRC patients treated with radical surgery or chemoradiotherapy at The Central Hospital of Wuhan from January 2020 to December 2022. MLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and FR+CTCs were categorized into high and low groups and clinicopathologic features were compared. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were analyzed using COX analysis and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Three ML algorithms, namely, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR), were utilized to construct the predictive models, and their performance metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), precision, recall, F1 value, AUC, and calibration curve were compared.

Results: MLR, FR+ CTCs, and T stage independently predicted PFS (P<0.05), both higher MLR and FR+CTCs levels indicating a significantly shorter PFS (P=0.004). The T stage was the only factor predictive of OS (P=0.043). NLR and PLR did not show significant prognostic effects on PFS or OS (P > 0.05). The RF model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 0.63, sensitivity of 0.69, PPV of 0.75, a precision of 0.43, a recall of 0.5, and an F1 value of 0.43, outperforming the other models.

Conclusion: High MLR and high FR+CTCs are associated with a poorer PFS in CRC patients, suggesting their utility in prognostic assessment. NLR and PLR did not show significant prognostic value in this study. The RF algorithm-based model showed the best predictive performance for post-radical treatment outcomes in CRC.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs); machine learning (ML); monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR); prediction model; prognostic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients Screening and Follow-up Workflow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves of OS (A) in MLR, NLR, PLR and FR+CTCs groups, PFS (B) in MLR, NLR, PLR and FR+CTCs groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of PFS (A), OS (B) in MLR group, PFS (C), OS (D) in NLR group, PFS (E), OS (F) in PLR group, PFS (G), OS (H) in FR+CTCs group, PFS (I), OS (J) in combined MLR amd FR+CTCs group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves for the three models on the training set (A) and testing set (B).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calibration curves for the three models.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. (2002) 420:860–7. doi: 10.1038/nature01322 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin W-W, Karin M. A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. (2007) 117:1175–83. doi: 10.1172/JCI31537 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Multhoff G, Molls M, Radons J. Chronic inflammation in cancer development. Front Immunol. (2012) 2:98. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00098 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kacan T, Babacan NA, Seker M, Yucel B, Bahceci A, Eren AA, et al. . Could the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio be a poor prognostic factor for non small cell lung cancers? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. (2014) 15:2089–94. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.5.2089 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources