Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;14(10):e70947.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.70947.

Reactive Oxygen Species: From Tumorigenesis to Therapeutic Strategies in Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Reactive Oxygen Species: From Tumorigenesis to Therapeutic Strategies in Cancer

Iqra Attique et al. Cancer Med. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Reactive oxygen species (ROS), a class of highly reactive molecules, are closely linked to the pathogenesis of various cancers. While ROS primarily originate from normal cellular processes, external stimuli can also contribute to their production. Cancer cells typically exhibit elevated ROS levels due to disrupted redox homeostasis, characterized by an imbalance between antioxidant and oxidant species. ROS play a dual role in cancer biology: at moderate levels, they facilitate tumor progression by regulating oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, inducing mutations, promoting proliferation, extracellular matrix remodeling, invasion, immune modulation, and angiogenesis. However, excessive ROS levels can cause cellular damage and initiate apoptosis, necroptosis, or ferroptosis.

Methods: This review explores molecular targets involved in redox homeostasis dysregulation and examines the impact of ROS on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Literature from recent in vitro and in vivo studies was analyzed to assess how ROS modulation contributes to cancer development and therapy.

Results: Findings indicate that ROS influence cancer progression through various pathways and cellular mechanisms. Targeting ROS synthesis or enhancing ROS accumulation in tumor cells has shown promising anticancer effects. These therapeutic strategies exhibit significant potential to impair tumor growth while also interacting with elements of the TME.

Conclusion: The ROS serve as both promoters and suppressors of cancer depending on their intracellular concentration. Their complex role offers valuable opportunities for targeted cancer therapies. While challenges remain in precisely modulating ROS for therapeutic benefit, they hold promise as synergistic agents alongside conventional treatments, opening new avenues in cancer management.

Keywords: cancer; homeostatic dysregulation; reactive oxygen species; signal transducer; tumorigenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The figure illustrates the differential level of ROS in three cellular contexts‐normal, tumor‐promoting, and tumor‐suppressing conditions. In normal conditions, ROS levels are maintained at a balanced state essential for normal homeostasis. Under tumor‐promoting conditions, moderately increased ROS levels are observed along with increased metabolism, growth signaling, and antioxidant inhibition. In tumor‐suppressing conditions, elevated ROS levels promote DNA damage and cell death, mostly through apoptosis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Schematic representation of the molecular mechanism of the KEAP‐Nrf2 ARE pathway: Under normal conditions, the Nrf2 remains attached to KEAP, together with Cul3, and is subjected to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Under oxidative stress, the cysteine residues in KEAP oxidize, causing Nrf2 to dissociate and translocate into the nucleus where it binds to MAF proteins and induces the expression of anti‐oxidative and cytoprotective entities; ARE, antioxidant response element; Cul3, Cullin 3; KEAP1, Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein 1; MAF, small musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid‐2‐related factor 2.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The dynamic and complex tumor microenvironment includes different cellular components such as cancer cells, immune cells, CAFs, and endothelial cells, along with non‐cellular elements such as the ECM.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Impact of ROS on tumor microenvironment; (i) immune cell modulation; (ii) ROS‐mediated ECM remodeling; (iii) ROS‐mediated angiogenesis; (iv) epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).

Similar articles

References

    1. Davies K. J., ed., “Oxidative Stress: The Paradox of Aerobic Life,” in Biochemical Society Symposia (Portland Press Limited, 1995). - PubMed
    1. Sies H., Belousov V. V., Chandel N. S., et al., “Defining Roles of Specific Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Cell Biology and Physiology,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 23, no. 7 (2022): 499–515. - PubMed
    1. Pizzino G., Irrera N., Cucinotta M., et al., “Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017, no. 1 (2017): 8416763. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert A. J. and Brand M. D., “Reactive Oxygen Species Production by Mitochondria,” Mitochondrial DNA: Methods and Protocols 554 (2009): 165–181. - PubMed
    1. Checa J. and Aran J. M., “Reactive Oxygen Species: Drivers of Physiological and Pathological Processes,” Journal of Inflammation Research 13 (2020): 1057–1073. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

Grants and funding