Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 23;9(18):4727-4735.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015634.

Inequalities in CAR T-cell therapy access for US patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL: a SEER-Medicare data analysis

Affiliations

Inequalities in CAR T-cell therapy access for US patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL: a SEER-Medicare data analysis

Andrea P Chung et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown curative potential for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other malignancies, but its accessibility among Medicare patients, particularly in disadvantaged populations, remains uncertain. This study aims to assess CAR-T use among Medicare patients with DLBCL receiving third-line or later (3L+) treatment, focusing on access disparities and their impact on clinical outcomes. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2007 to 2020, multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics and the effects of distance to authorized treatment centers (ATCs) on CAR-T access. Between 2017 and 2020, 2241 patients were treated for 3L+ DLBCL in the SEER-Medicare data, of whom 122 (5.4%) received CAR-Ts. CAR-T recipients were less likely to have multiple comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.904; P = .001) but more likely to live in higher income areas (OR, 1.176; P = .004). If distance to the nearest ATC for "poor-access" states (average distance to ATC, 104.4 miles) decreased to the average distance in "better-access" states (34.2 miles), there would be a 37.6% increase in number of patients receiving CAR-Ts (6.6%-9.1%; P < .001). These findings highlight substantial disparities in CAR-T use, driven by geographic and socioeconomic factors. Addressing these barriers could significantly enhance equitable access to CAR-T therapy and improve outcomes for underserved populations, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce geographic and systemic barriers to care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.P.C., J.T.S., and S.M. are employees of FTI Consulting, Inc, a consulting firm to health care, life sciences, government, and nongovernmental entities. S.V. and K.H., are employees of Kite/Gilead, the sponsor of this study. At the time of the study, A.R.P. was an employee of Kite/Gilead, the sponsor of this study. M.-A.P. reports honoraria from Adicet, Allogene, AlloVir, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Equilium, ExeVir, ImmPACT Bio, Incyte, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Omeros, Orca Bio, Sanofi, Syncopation, VectivBio AG, and Vor Biopharma; serves on data safety monitoring boards (DSMBs) for Cidara Therapeutics and Sellas Life Sciences; serves on the scientific advisory board of NexImmune; reports ownership interests in NexImmune, Omeros, and Orca Bio; and has received institutional research support for clinical trials from Allogene, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Nektar Therapeutics, and Novartis. R.T.M. reports serving as consultant for Incyte, Kite/Gilead, and Novartis; receiving research support from Gamida Cell, Kite/Gilead, Orca Bio, and Novartis; serving on scientific advisory committee for Artiva; and participating in a DSMB for Novartis, Century Therapeutics, and Vor Biopharma. G.L.S. has received research funding to the institution from Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Beyond Spring, and GPCR Therapeutics, Inc; and is on the DSMB for ArcellX. L.C.A. is a consultant for Incyte, Kite/Gilead, and BMS.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Analysis sample after inclusion and exclusion criteria. FFS, fee-for-service; MA, Medicare Advantage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of odds ratios of receiving CAR-Ts by demographic or county-level characteristics. ‡County-level characteristics. OR, odds ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Distance to the nearest ATC and average median household income.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of ORs of receiving CAR-Ts by patient characteristic. OR, odds ratio.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cumulative number of life years gained from improved CAR-T access.

References

    1. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Facts and statistics overview. Updated 2023. https://www.lls.org/facts-and-statistics/facts-and-statistics-overview
    1. Tang L, Huang Z, Mei H, Hu Y. Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: achievements, challenges and future prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):306. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghilardi G, Williamson S, Pajarillo R, et al. CAR T-cell immunotherapy in minority patients with lymphoma. NEJM Evid. 2024;3(4) - PubMed
    1. Gajra A, Zalenski A, Sannareddy A, Jeune-Smith Y, Kapinos K, Kansagra A. Barriers to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies in clinical practice. Pharmaceut Med. 2022;36(3):163–171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alqazaqi R, Schinke C, Thanendrarajan S, et al. Geographic and racial disparities in access to chimeric antigen receptor–T cells and bispecific antibodies trials for multiple myeloma. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8) - PMC - PubMed